Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Design Questions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the design of a numerical model for a vertical axis wind turbine, specifically a straight blade giromill. The designer is encountering issues with power output calculations, producing results that exceed theoretical limits based on wind availability. Key variables in the model include airfoil type, wind speed, tip speed ratio, chord length, and blade count, with calculations involving tangential and normal forces derived from aerodynamic coefficients. Concerns are raised about the Reynolds number affecting the accuracy of lift and drag coefficients, particularly at higher angles of attack. The designer seeks assistance in troubleshooting the model and optimizing design parameters while ensuring power outputs align with theoretical expectations.
lanew
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I'm currently in the process of designing a numerical model for a vertical axis wind turbine, more specifically, a straight blade giromill. I'm currently having trouble because depending on the variables I choose, I can produce more power than available from the wind.

My Calculations are based off the following diagrams:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/selection002y.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/selection003r.png/

I can post the code (MATLAB), but I'm sure no one wants to sift through that, but here's my design methodology:

User Defined Variables:
Airfoil (NACA00XX)
Wind Speed, U
Tip Speed Ratio, \lambda
Chord, c
Radius, R
Number of Blades, N
Change in Azimuthal Position, d\theta
Swept Area, A

From these variables, I have a loop that iterates \theta, the azimuthal position, and calculated the following variables each time:

Chord Velocity
V_c=U(\lambda+\cos(\theta)

Normal Velocity
V_n=U\sin(\theta)

Angle of Attack
\alpha=\arctan\left(\frac{V_n}{V_c}\right)

Relative Wind Speed
W=\sqrt{V_c^2+V_n^2}

Coefficient of Lift and Drag
Calculated using XFoil

Tangential Force Coefficient
C_t=C_l\sin(\alpha)-C_d\cos(\alpha)

Normal Force Coefficient
C_n=C_l\cos(\alpha)+C_d\sin(\alpha)

Tangential Force
F_t=\frac{C_t \rho c h W^2}{2}

Normal Force
F_n=\frac{C_n \rho c h W^2}{2}

As I said, the above variables are calculated for every \theta_i. Once the loop is finished, the following variables are calculated:

Average Tangential Force
\bar{F}_t=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{i=0}^{2\pi} F_t(\theta) \mathrm{d}\theta
Numerical Approximation
\bar{F}_t=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n F_t

Total Torque
T=N\bar{F}_tR

Total Power
P=T\omega

I have checked the numbers individually, and my \alpha's range from 0-13^{\circ}, C_l and C_d range from -1.8-1.8, C_t from 0-0.34, and C_n from 0-1.22.

For some reason, if I choose parameters such as:

NACA0015
U=4.5\,m/s
\lambda=5
c=0.5\,m
R=1.0\,m
h=10\,m
N=3

I get a power output of:
P=10\,kW

However, I don't believe I should be getting more than:
P_{max}=\frac{\rho AU^3}{2}

Can someone please help me? I'm pulling my hair out here. If the code would actually help, let me know and I can try and post it.

Thanks So Much.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am unfamiliar with this type of device. Could you post a picture of what you are working on? What is the tip speed ratio and swept area?

I do have a question about your use of xfoil. In order to get a Cd I assume you are running it in viscous mode. What Reynolds number are you inputting? Because if your Reynolds number is really low, which I imagine it will be at least during part of the rotation cycle if U=4.5m/s, then Xfoil will likely have problems at the high angles of attack.
 
Certainly, here is a picture of the general idea:
http://www.manufacturer.com/upload/product/6414997/Vertical+Axis+Wind+Turbine+Generator_0_detail.jpg . The swept area has been fixed at A=20\,m^2. I need to optimize the dimensions given this area.

As I mentioned, I don't think my AoA is too high, it maxes out at about \alpha=13^{\circ} (depending on the Tip Speed Ratio). Does this seem too high for low Reynolds?

I've been using Tip Speed Ratios of \lambda=3 to \lambda=5 for initial testing. This results in relative velocities of W=9 to W=18 when \lambda=3, and W=18 to W=27 when \lambda=5.

My Reynolds number \left(Re=\frac{Wc}{\nu}\right) for \lambda=3 ranges from Re=5.1e5 to Re=7.6e5.

Thanks so much for taking the time to reply. I appreciate it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K