Vertical flow rate of water stream under gravitation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on optimizing water flow for a physics project using gravitational principles. The user initially measures a tap flow rate of 0.1L/sec to 0.3L/sec and proposes using a bucket as a reservoir to increase flow through a hole at the bottom. Key calculations involve using the formula v = sqrt(2*h*g) to determine the velocity of water based on height h and gravitational acceleration g. Additionally, the conversation touches on the effects of pipe length on flow rate and pressure, emphasizing the importance of Bernoulli's principle and the potential for cavitation in longer pipes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Bernoulli's equation
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and gravitational acceleration
  • Ability to perform calculations involving flow rate and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply Bernoulli's equation to real-world fluid flow scenarios
  • Research the effects of pipe diameter and length on flow rate and pressure
  • Study the principles of cavitation and its implications in fluid systems
  • Explore advanced fluid dynamics simulations using software like ANSYS Fluent
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, hobbyists working on fluid dynamics projects, and anyone interested in optimizing water flow systems for experimental setups.

Positronized
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to get the rig for my physics project set up which requires some constant water flow through the system. Unfortunately it's requiring a bit more water inflow than the tap can provide. I measured the tap's flow rate to be somewhere around 0.1L/sec to 0.3L/sec

Now because I don't want to invest in a water pump I'm planning to create some quick and dirty device to provide a bit more flow. I'm thinking of a reservoir of water (probably just a bucket) with a hole in the bottom. Now if I raise the bucket to sufficient height above my expermental device and let the water flow through the hole vertically into my rig, I might be able to get enough flow rate.

But I have no idea if this is even practical. I meant I don't know how high I have to raise the bucket to and if it's going to even provide higher flow rate than the tap. So let's say if the hole at the bottom of the bucket is half an inch diameter, how can I calculate the flow rate of water when I raise the bucket to height h above the system? (Presumably the flow rate will change along the stream due to gravitation acceleration so I would appreciate the mathematical explanation for it too if possible) I meant I otherwise understand things in physics but fluid dynamics stuff just confuse me a bit.

Oh and also, is there any direct way of calculating the force/pressure/momentum of a flowing stream of water? Say if I have a water stream flowing, assuming completely uniformly with no surface friction or viscous drag, at a some rate Phi L/sec so I can quite easily convert that into some flow velocity v ms-1 given the surface it's flowing through using the flux integral. Now if some random object is placed at that surface and obstructs the flow, what force would the water flow exert on the object?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Positronized said:
(Presumably the flow rate will change along the stream due to gravitation acceleration so I would appreciate the mathematical explanation for it too if possible)

Think this through.
 
cesiumfrog said:
Think this through.

Well I did do some quick kinematic calculation on it but, while I can find out the velocity of falling "droplets" of water when it reaches the rig, the continuum of water flow stream just confuses me.

*EDIT: So can I just go: v of water = sqrt(2*h*g) at the device, but water is let flowing through a circular hole of diameter 1.5cm so assuming it reaches the rig through in circular flat surface area = (5.625*10^-5)Pi cm^2 hence flow rate = v*A m^3/s whatever that comes down to?
 
Last edited:
If the bucket looses 1L/min, whatever is below will certainly receive.. 1L/min. Otherwise, well, where would the water come from? If the liquid accelerates, expect the cross-sectional area to vary (and the steady stream will break up into droplets..). o:)
 
Last edited:
cesiumfrog said:
If the bucket looses 1L/min, whatever is below will certainly receive.. 1L/min. Otherwise, well, where would the water come from? If the liquid accelerates, expect the cross-sectional area to vary (and the steady stream will break up into droplets..). o:)

What if, say to prevent that, I fix a pipe from the hole right down to the rig below it? So now the flow rate would depend on the *depth* of the water (which now includes the pipe length too)? And so then what calculation would this turn into?

*And I editted the original post, inserted one more paragraph concerning something completely irrelevant to the topic but I thought I shouldn't post another thread so it'd be nice if someone could also address that too :-p
 
Last edited:
This might be over-simplifying things, but have you considered just running hoses from a couple of different taps and combining the flows?
 
cheh.. apply bernoulli equations and you ll get the solution to your numerical part. and you can easily calculate the momentum of water jet(by simple Newtonian mechanics).
but i have got to say, the method DANGER suggested is far more easier and i guess efficient to. you won't like to run with a bucket in b/w your project presentation
 
cesiumfrog said:
If the bucket looses 1L/min, whatever is below will certainly receive.. 1L/min. Otherwise, well, where would the water come from? If the liquid accelerates, expect the cross-sectional area to vary (and the steady stream will break up into droplets..). o:)

In fact, if you add a pipe to the bucket, you will be able to LOWER the pressure at the hole in the bucket, hence increasing the flow. Of course, once the pipe is about 10 meters long, this won't help anymore as you'd get cavitation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K