Very interesting estimation problem

AI Thread Summary
Annie and Evelyn estimate that a small glass of water, holding 250mL, takes about 10 days to evaporate completely. This leads to the conclusion that approximately 25mL evaporates daily from a surface area of 25cm². By calculating the Earth's surface area and considering that 71% is covered by water, they extrapolate this evaporation rate to estimate average annual precipitation. The discussion emphasizes the cyclical nature of evaporation and precipitation, suggesting that the water evaporated from the glass represents the annual precipitation. Overall, the estimation process highlights the relationship between evaporation rates and precipitation depth on Earth.
rocketboy
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
"Annie and Evelyn observe that, on average, it takes approximately 10 days for a small glass of water to completely evaporate when left outdoors. What would they estimate for the average annual precipitation on Earth?" (Answer in depth of precipitation)

Here's my though process but I have a feeling it is a bit off, if you could help me out it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!

Ok, so first I assumed that a small glass holds 250mL of water and is 10cm tall, and that all water that evaporates in a year falls in that same year, so the quantity evaporated = quantity precipitated.

So the Volume of the glass = 250mL = 250cm^3

Thus 250cm^3 = Surface area of the glass x 10(cm)

Thus the surface area of the glass is 25cm^2

So it takes 10 days for 250mL of water to evaporate from an area of 25cm^2, and thus in 1 day, 25mL of water will evaporate from that surface area.

Then i found the surface area of the earth, and took 71% of that (the part of earch covered in water) and found the annual evaporation of water. Then I spread that out over the entire Earth's surface area to find the average annual precipitation in depth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me whatever is in the cup would be the annual precepitation.

Every 10 days it will empty the cup, then rain it back down and fill up the cup. Over and over again in a cyclic pattern.

That's a very open ended question though.
 
Last edited:
on second glance, your work looks good to me. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top