Very simple issue on Fourier series

DWill
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am just trying to prove to myself the Fourier series representation of a periodic rectangular pulse train. The pulses have some period T, and each pulse has magnitude equal to 1 over a duration of T/4, and 0 the rest of the cycle.

Using trignometric Fourier series, I get the following:

a0 = 1/4 - (dc value = 0.25, this makes sense)

an = ∫1*cos(n2πft)dt over (0,T/4)
= \frac{sin(\frac{nπ}{2})}{nπ}

bn = ∫1*sin(n2πft)dt over (0,T/4)
= \frac{1}{nπ}(1-cos(\frac{nπ}{2})

The bn term doesn't make sense to me, because it seems to contribute a dc term for each value of n. I double-checked the integration, although it's a very simple integral. This might just be the case of a really obvious mistake I'm making and I just can't seem to pinpoint it.

Thanks for the clarification!

EDIT: I recall that if I shift the reference axis so that t=0 lies at the midpoint of a pulse, the function has even symmetry and thus only the an terms will exist. However, I'm a bit confused why these extra dc terms result if I just shift the reference that I'm looking at a bit.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey DWill.

Just a few comments.

As far as I remember, the natural period for Fourier series is going to be 2*pi units. So if you have a period of T, then this implies that we have to adjust the terms inside the sines and cosines as well as the normalization terms for the projections.

What this translate to is that if T is our period then we use the following formula:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourie...general_interval_.5Ba.2C.C2.A0a_.2B_.CF.84.5D

This means that we have to figure out the following integrals:

an = 1/T∫1*cos(n2πt/T)dt over (0,T/4)
= 1/T x T/(2πn) [sin(2πnt/T)] t=(0,T/4)
= 1/(2πn) x sin(πn/2)

bn = 1/T∫1*sin(n2πt/T)dt over (0,T/4)
= 1/T * T/(2πn) [-cos(2πnt/T)] t = (0,T/4)
= 1/(2πn) [1 -cos(πn/2)]

So if my calculations are right, you are missing a 1/2 scaling factor term.

Now I had a bit of a mess around with deriving the the final function which is meant to match the wiki definition of the Fourier series but I made a mistake when using some trig substitutions so I haven't posted it.
 
The bn terms are not dc. They multiply sines, just as the an terms multiply cosines.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top