Very simple log problem - I'm missing something.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a misunderstanding of logarithmic calculations, specifically the base used in the calculations. The user initially calculates Log(A) using base e instead of the required base 10, leading to incorrect results. It is noted that older textbooks may expect the use of log tables or slide rules for such calculations. The importance of distinguishing between natural logs (ln) and common logs (log) is emphasized. The user acknowledges the mistake and expresses gratitude for the clarification.
Zaent
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
A=12^(1/5)
Log(A)=(1/5)Log(12)

The next part in the book says:

Log(A)=0.2158
A=1.644

I don't know how to do this without a calculator, and with a calculator I'm getting 1.24.

I'm doing e^0.2158

Can anyone please tell me where I'm going wrong here?Note: this isn't homework, just something I've come across
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How old is the book? If old (pre 1980) then the expectation is that you have and use a set of log tables.

Also log(A) implies log to base 10 i.e. 10.1258.
The standard notation for logs to base e is Ln(A).
 
Your mistake is using e and not 10. Base e is used when doing stuff with natural logs ie ln() and 10 is used when doing base 10 logs.

Google can supplement a calculator if one isn't readily available.

The old fashioned way of solving log problems was to use precomputed log tables. Alternatively you could use the ll scales of a decitrig sliderule.
 
Thank you both! I figured the book was old because it was asking me to do this, but I still knew my log knowledge was off somewhere. I'll remember the base 10 thing in future. Thanks again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top