Vibrating String and Electrons: Exploring Wave Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter suzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Vibrating
AI Thread Summary
A vibrating string fixed at both ends creates a standing wave pattern, similar to the wave function of an electron confined between two walls. The electron is most likely to be found where the wave function's magnitude is largest and least likely where it is smallest. This relationship highlights the connection between classical wave behavior and quantum mechanics. The discussion clarifies that while a vibrating string represents a classical wave, the electron's behavior can be described using similar wave principles. Understanding this analogy is key to grasping quantum states and probabilities.
suzy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello ^.^

Here is my question~~

" A vibrating string fixed at both ends displays a standing wave pattern. An example is shown in picture below. If an electron is confined to move in one dimension between two fixed walls, one of its allowed wave functions looks exactly like that in picture. Where is the electron in this quantum state most and least likely to be found? "

http://capa6.phy.ohiou.edu/psc105/gif/f2h.gif

What i don't understand is that how can a vibrating string can have an electron? I thought that vibrating string just have a wave.

Sorry about my bad english, english isn't my first language, but hope u all can understand what I'm trying to say.

Thanks for ur help.

Suzy ^.^
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks for the reply.

So the electron in this quantum state most likely to be found where the wavefunction's magnititude is largest.
And least likely to be found where magnititude is smallest.

thanks

Suzy ^.^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top