How Does Adding a Mass Impact Vibration Amplitude in an Undamped System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jasonbot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vibration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the changed displacement amplitude (X1') of an air compressor mounted on a spring system when an additional mass is introduced. The original mass (m1) is 150 kg with a spring stiffness (k1) of 3000 N/m, resulting in a measured displacement amplitude (X1) of 0.0002 m at an operating speed of 1800 r/min. After incorporating an undamped isolation system with mass (m2) of 12 kg and a natural frequency (w2) of 105 rad/s, the recalculated displacement amplitude (X1') is determined to be -0.000109 m. The calculations utilize the equation for vibration absorbers and static deflection to derive the final result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vibration absorber principles
  • Knowledge of dynamic systems and natural frequency calculations
  • Familiarity with spring stiffness and mass relationships
  • Proficiency in basic physics equations related to motion and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of vibration absorbers in mechanical systems
  • Learn about static and dynamic deflection calculations in spring systems
  • Explore the effects of mass addition on system dynamics
  • Investigate advanced topics in undamped and damped vibration systems
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, students studying dynamics, and professionals involved in vibration analysis and isolation system design will benefit from this discussion.

jasonbot
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An air compressor of mass m1 = 150 kg is mounted on a spring of stiffness k1= 3000 N/m. The measured
displacement amplitude X1 = 0.0002 m at the operating speed of N = 1800 r/min. If an undamped isolation
system with mass m2=12 kg and a natural frequency w2 = 105 rad/s is fixed to the compressor, calculate the
changed displacement amplitude X1 for the overall system


Homework Equations



As far as I understand this is the relevant equation: X1/delta_st=(1-(omega/omega2)^2)/((1+k2/k1-(omega/omega_1)^2)(1-(omega/omega_2)^2)-k2/k1)


The Attempt at a Solution



As far as I understand its a vibration absorber problem.

omega=1800*(2π/60)=188,5rad/s
omega1=(k1/m1)^.5=4.47
k2=omega_2^2*m2=105^2*12=132300N/m

X1/delta_st=(1-(omega/omega2)^2)/((1+k2/k1-(omega/omega_1)^2)(1-(omega/omega_2)^2)-k2/k1)

X1/delta_st=-5,836x10^-4

delta_st=-0,342m

I don't think that's right :|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a dynamic absorber problem. While I have not gone through your arithmetic, I see that delta_st is static deflection which is how much the weight of the compressor deflects the spring under static conditions.

You should be solving for X1. Here is your equation: X1/delta_st=-5,836x10^-4
Solve it for X1 by plugging in delta_st.
 
That makes sense actually.

So assuming that I go

delta_st=F0/k=(150+12)*9.81/3000=0.52974

X1=delta_st*-5,836x10^-4=-0.000309

so then I'm assuming the changed displacement amplitude will be the difference between measured and X1 from calculations.

so X1'=-0.000309+0.0002=-0.000109mOh and thanks! <--- Sorry I forgot to add that :|
 
Last edited:
That looks good to me. I went through your arithmetic...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
987
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K