View from a spaceship at relativistic speeds

russdot
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If one was in a spaceship at rest in frame K and sees an evenly-distributed number of stars around them, what would the distribution of stars look like if you were traveling at relativistic speeds (frame K')?

I'm conflicted because I've seen animations online that seem to illustrate the stars 'bunching up' in front of you (in the direction of motion), but I would think that the starfield would become denser in a ring around the ship and less dense directly in front of you (the direction of motion) and less dense behind you due to length contraction. Below is a simple physical argument:
if the @ symbol is the spaceship, and the *'s are stars just to the left & right of the direction of motion:
................*
@ -->
................*

As velocity increases, length contraction increases in the direction of travel and the angle between the two stars becomes greater for the observer.
...*
@ ---------------------->
...*

So I am not quite sure what actually happens?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to distinguish between what is measured in your frame and what you actually see visually--the second is affected by optical effects like aberration and the Doppler effect, the first is designed to compensate for such effects. Length contraction is what is measured in your frame, but the length in your frame is different from the apparent visual length, because photons from either end of an object that hit your eyes at a single moment were not actually emitted at the same moment in your frame, so the object has moved in between the time light from one end was emitted and the time light from the other end was emitted, which distorts the apparent visual length (see this thread on the Penrose-Terrell effect). Likewise, in the rest frame of a rocket traveler stars do not actually become bunched in front of him (what happens is that the distance between stars becomes contracted in the direction he's moving relative to the stars, though I don't understand why you think this would cause the starfield to become denser in a ring around him), but visually they appear to become bunched in this way due to the visual effect of "aberration"--here are some pages that discuss this:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html (from this more general page on what would be seen by a relativistic traveler: http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/ )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_of_light

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/Spaceship/spaceship.html

http://www.anu.edu.au/Physics/Savage/TEE/site/tee/learning/aberration/aberration.html

http://www.relativitybook.com/resources/aberration.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JesseM,
Thanks for the reply, those links helped a lot :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top