Violating the law of conservation of energy

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between angular momentum, moment of inertia, and angular velocity of a rotating body. It is stated that if the radius of the body changes, its moment of inertia and angular velocity will also change, but the angular momentum will remain constant. The new energy of the system is also calculated and it is determined that work must be done to change the radius. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that there are no silly questions.
  • #1
deep838
117
0
I know that's impossible, so please help me!

Let there be a body rotating about its axis, with a moment of inertia I and an angular velcity w.
The angular momentum of the system is L = Iw.
Now, if the radius of the body change, its moment of inertia will also change. Let the new moment of inertia be I`, such that, I`= kI.
But the angular momentum of the system will remain constant.
So, the angular velcity must change. So, w`=w/k.
But, initially, the energy of the system was purely kinetic and was given by
E=1/2 Iw2.
The new energy is given by, I`= 1/2 I`w`2 = 1/2 kI (w/k)2
So, E`= E/k.

So the new energy of the system is either more {0<k<1} of less {k>1} than the previous energy!

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You need to do work to change the radius. Imagine whirling a ball on a string around. If takes work to pull in the ball.
 
  • #3
ok...got it... so silly of me to even ask this.
 
  • #4
The only silly question is the one you don't ask.
 
  • #5
hmm... who said that?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
870
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Back
Top