Violation of symmetry and conservation

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Does EM force obey the conservation of strangeness like the strong force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
touqra said:
Does EM force obey the conservation of strangeness like the strong force?
yes it does...

If you ask yourself the question as to how this strangeness conservation law has been 'invented', you will know which interactions respect this law and what interactions do not. Do you know which process lead to the idea that 'there has to be another conservation law active' ?

here's your answer in short


marlon
 
Last edited:

The concept of symmetry and conservation is a fundamental principle in physics that governs the behavior of forces and particles. It states that certain properties, such as energy, momentum, and electric charge, are conserved in all physical interactions.

Violation of symmetry and conservation can occur when a force or particle does not adhere to these principles. This can happen in certain interactions, such as radioactive decay, where properties like charge and mass are not conserved.

In the case of the electromagnetic (EM) force, it is known to follow the laws of symmetry and conservation. This force is responsible for interactions between charged particles and is described by the theory of electromagnetism. It obeys the principles of conservation of energy, momentum, and electric charge, as well as the laws of symmetry, such as gauge symmetry.

On the other hand, the strong force, which is responsible for binding quarks together to form protons and neutrons, has a property called strangeness that is not conserved. Strangeness is a quantum number that describes the difference between the number of strange quarks and anti-strange quarks in a particle. In strong interactions, this property can change, violating the conservation of strangeness.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the EM force does not obey the conservation of strangeness like the strong force. This is because the EM force does not directly interact with quarks, which are the particles that possess strangeness. Instead, it only interacts with charged particles, such as protons and electrons, which do not have strangeness.

In summary, the EM force follows the principles of symmetry and conservation, while the strong force violates the conservation of strangeness. This highlights the importance of understanding the fundamental principles of physics and how they govern the behavior of forces and particles in the universe.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top