Virtual Observatory: Cruise the Heavens from Your Recliner

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Virtual
AI Thread Summary
Virtual observatories offer a way to explore the night sky without the need for a physical telescope. Users can access various software options, such as Stellarium and Slooh, which provide virtual planetarium experiences and even free trials. While some discussions highlight the limitations of these tools, such as the perception of star movement due to distance, they still provide an engaging way to enjoy astronomy from home. The conversation emphasizes the accessibility of celestial exploration for those who prefer comfort over traditional stargazing. Overall, virtual observatories serve as a convenient alternative for astronomy enthusiasts.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
Are you too lazy, or cheap, to buy a decent telescope, set it up and cruise the night sky? But would still like to cruise the heavens from the comfort of your recliner with a fresh cup of herbal tea in your non-clicker hand? Here is your chance:

http://freeware.intrastar.net/planetarium.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks Chronos, great freeware. Most of those are actually virtual planetariums though, I didn't see any true VO's. Actually, I don't know of any free virtual observatories for the general public.

slooh.com has a pretty cool voyeur-style free trial membership though.
 
Try Stellarium.
 
Great link. I always wanted a computer-based software of this type.
 
In Stellarium , I guess the Heisenberg's Uncertainity Principle is quite applicable.Because when you zoom into see a star closely , it starts moving at enormous speeds , and I could never see the star properly.

Jk.

I guess when you view the stars from quite a distance, they seem stationary , as you close on them , they seem to start moving more rapidly.Ofcourse the star has been moving at the same speed irrespective of , from what distance we are viewing it.

Aactually , when we are viewing it from a large distance , the stars seem to be stationary relative to others, but when viewed closely , the other celestial bodies are out of view and we see that star has speed up.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top