Visualizing Vector Calculus: Sketching Field Lines with Scalar Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves sketching field lines derived from a scalar function f(r) multiplied by a position vector r in a vector calculus context. The original poster expresses difficulty in starting the sketch without knowing the specific form of the scalar function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the vector field and its radial characteristics, questioning how the unknown scalar function f(r) influences the field lines. The original poster considers various forms of f(r) and their potential effects on the field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints regarding the relationship between the scalar function and the vector field, while others confirm the original poster's reasoning about the possible behaviors of the field lines. The discussion is ongoing with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is constrained by the lack of a specific scalar function, which complicates their ability to visualize the field lines. There is also a mention of the forum's support for LaTeX, suggesting that participants may benefit from clearer mathematical expressions.

MrB3nn
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let r be a position vector from the origin (r=xi+yj+zk), whose magnitude is r, and let f(r) be a scalar function of r. Sketch the field lines of f(r)r

2. Homework Equations
1 \nablax(\nabla\Psi)=0
2 \nabla.(\nablaxv)=0
3 \nablax(\nablaxv)=\nabla(\nabla.v)-\nabla^{}2v
4 \nabla.(\Psiv)=\Psi\nabla.v+v.\nabla\Psi
5 \nablax(\Psiv)=\Psi\nablaxv+(\nabla\Psi)xv
6 \nabla.(v.w=w.(\nablaxv)-v.(\nablaxw)
7 \nablax(vxw=v(\nabla.w-w(\nabla.v+(w.\nabla)v-(v.\nabla)w


The Attempt at a Solution


I can't get started on this question. I have no idea how you can draw a sketch of the field lines when the scalar function is unknown. My intuition says you should be able to use some of those identities but I need a push in the right direction. Please, someone give me that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field lines represent the direction of the vector field.

Hint: what is the direction of your vector field, and in what way does it depend on f(r)? (trick question)
 
oh didn't realize this had posted, the site was crashing when I was trying to post. Well I know the field is always radial from the origin due to it's cartesian components. I also know the magnitude of the field will increase as you move in any direction from the origin. But in my mind, I don't know what f(r) is. I am thinking that f(r) can be negative sometimes i.e. f(r)=5-er, or negative always i.e. f(r)=r. Therefore, in my mind, if I multiply this scalar field with the vector field, it the combined effect could change the whole thing. In some places the field may converge, in some it may diverge etc. What I mean is, the field lines may reverse in some places. Am I thinking of this the right way?
 
Yes, that is correct. You might have points where the vector field vanishes, diverges or reverses (i.e. points to the origin). But this is all legit :)

By the way, this forum supports latex, which is a lot easier to use than the equation you wrote. Might want to look into it!

Example:

\nabla \times (\nabla\Psi) = 0

(Press the quote button to see how you can write it)
 
Thanks a lot for your help dude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K