Vitamin D from Sun: What Should be Exposed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter annoymage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun
AI Thread Summary
Sun exposure is essential for vitamin D production, but the optimal areas of the body to expose are debated. Studies suggest that exposing larger surface areas, such as the back and chest, is more effective than just the head and arms. Generally, 5 to 10 minutes of sun exposure during summer is considered sufficient for vitamin D synthesis. There is no consensus on the exact daily requirement for vitamin D, and while vitamin D is processed systemically in the body, insufficient exposure may not lead to localized deficiencies in bone development. To maximize vitamin D production while minimizing UV damage, it is recommended to expose larger areas of skin for shorter durations rather than prolonged exposure of smaller areas.
annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
i've read some article about sun exposure to help body produce vitamin D, but, just out of curiosity, which part of body that should be exposed? is only head and hand will be suffice?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I read a study that stated that head and arms are insufficient. It seems that a large surface area (back, chest) is preferable. Several studies indicate that 5 - 10 minutes of exposure a day (summer) is sufficient.
 
by insufficient, what will happen? did vitamin D distribute equally to all bones? or will that maybe restrain bones development on the unexposed area?

sorry, my fundamental biology is very weak
 
There are a number of competing studies and no conensus as to how much D is required per day, so I'm not sure that there is an answer to your question. I can say that Vitamin D is processed in a systemic fashion, wherever it is synthesized in the pigmant of the skin. Keeping one arm bathed in sunlight, and the other in darkness will not deprive the other of the Vitamin D.

From a practical point of view, you want to maximize your D production, and minimize damage from UV correct? This supports marcusl in that a large surface area in a short time is better than your arms baking for hours.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top