# Voltage and current in a series circuit

1. May 25, 2012

### nsv23

Consider the circuit in the attachment

I know that the current is the same in a series circuit and voltage is divided at the 3 resistors. And resistance is added.
R = R1 + R2 + R3 = 100 + 200 + 300 = 600 Ω.
V = IR, 12 = I * 600, I = 0.02 amps = current flowing through the circuit.
V1 (voltage @ R1) = IR1 = .02 * 100 = 2 v
V2 (voltage @ R2) = IR2 = .02 * 200 = 4 v
V3 (voltage @ R3) = IR3 = .02 * 300 = 6 v
V1 + V2 + V3 = 2 + 4 + 6 = 12v same as the supplied voltage

If I measure the current at point A will it 0.02 A? I mean at A it has not passed through the resistance. So shouldn’t it be greater than 0.02 A and when meeting the resistance it reduces to 0.02A?
Assuming that the LED requires minimum 0.01 amps to glow, out of the 0.02 amps flowing in the circuit will the LED take only 0.01 amps and leave the remaining? If so after passing through the LED the current that flows to the -ve terminal is only 0.01?
When someone says “resistance is a circuit” does it mean that the resistance is there from the beginning of the circuit i.e. from the +ve terminal all the way to through the circuit to –ve terminal? If so how come? In the above case assuming I connect the +ve terminal of the 12V battery to first resistor by a piece of wire, shouldn’t current between +ve terminal and first resistor be greater than the current at the resistor?
Why is their voltage drop and not current reduction? How can voltage drop? Current is the flow of electrons right? When meeting with resistance isn’t the flow of electrons that is being restricted? And not the voltage which is the ‘force’ that ‘pushes’ the electrons?
What exactly happens when the flow of electrons meet with a resistor? Will some electrons be left at the resistor i.e. blocked by resistors and others carry on? For example current before meeting resistance is 10amps and after meeting a resistance reduces to 8amps. So 2amps are left at the resistance in other words electrons carrying the 2 amps are left at the resistance right? What happens to those electrons and current left at resistance?

#### Attached Files:

• ###### 14.jpg
File size:
46.9 KB
Views:
165
2. May 25, 2012

### tiny-tim

welcome to pf!

hi nsv23! welcome to pf!
yes
no, the current is the same throughout the circuit
it's exactly like water

suppose you have a number of water-wheels on a river, and a pump at the start of the river, putting the water under pressure P

as the river goes past each water-wheel, the pressure becomes less and less

but the current stays the same … how can it not do so? … water can't be created or destroyed, and the amount of water passing each point per second must be the same

similarly, electric current is charge per second, charge can't be created or destroyed, so how could the electric current not be the same?
if it needs 0.01 A, then it's getting twice as much, and it will probably glow twice as bright (or melt)
not exactly

it's like pushing a lot of blocks, you only push the back block, but you have to push hard enough to push all of them!

(mass is resistance to force, electric resistance is resistance to electric force)
i don't understand
no electrons are left behind, if they were, then there would be a build-up of negative charge (only happens at a capacitor, not a resistor)

the current is electrons per second, and that's the same everywhere

3. May 26, 2012

### nsv23

"If I measure the current at point A will it 0.02 A? I mean at A it has not passed through the resistance. So shouldn’t it be greater than 0.02 A and when meeting the resistance it reduces to 0.02A?"
I still have doubts about it. I am posting the same question in a different way.

"In the above case assuming I connect the +ve terminal of the 12V battery to first resistor by a piece of wire, shouldn’t current between +ve terminal and first resistor be greater than the current at the resistor?"
Both the questions are related. Let me elaborate.
Consider the first circuit. Here a wire is between the resistor and the battery’s +ve terminal and the wire is connecting them. Now current has to flow through the wire and reach R1 right? Between the +ve terminal and R1 there is no resistance except for the resistance of the wire which is very low and negligible. So therefore shouldn’t current be high in the wire and at the point of contact with R1 shouldn’t it reduce to 0.02 amps?
Now consider the second circuit below. R1 is directly connected to the +ve terminal of the battery. So as soon as the circuit is closed, the current flowing from the +ve terminal meets with resistance and is reduced to 0.02 amps, right?

"Assuming that the LED requires minimum 0.01 amps to glow, out of the 0.02 amps flowing in the circuit will the LED take only 0.01 amps and leave the remaining? If so after passing through the LED the current that flows to the -ve terminal is only 0.01?"
Why does it take all of 0.02 amps? Assuming the LED's maximum is 0.01 amps. Why does it melt, I mean can't it just accept 0.01 amps and leave the rest? If it leaves the rest isn’t the remaining 0.01 amps flowing back to the –ve terminal? Which means the current is not the same everywhere.
Now assuming LED's maximum is 0.02 amps, when current reaches the LED, it glows because it has absorbed the 0.02amps? If so there shouldn't be any current flowing after the LED right? Or taking the Water analogy, a tank filled with water, at one end there is water wheel. What happens is the pressure (voltage) causes the water (current) to flow and hit the water wheel (LED) which rotates (glows). After hitting the water wheel the water flows into a pipe which is connected to back tank. Is this what happens: because of voltage, current flows from +ve terminal, reaches the LED, lights it, goes back to the -ve terminal? The cycle repeats as long as the circuit is closed. Why does the LED glow continuously? I mean after hitting the water wheel it rotates and shouldn’t it stop? It is not stopping because of the speed at which the current flows? i.e. current lights the LED, leaves it, goes back to battery and starts again from the +ve terminal, all this in fraction of seconds, that the LED is on all the time. Or, is it because the flow is continuous, that the LED is getting constant supply and not because of speed. Like water from tank, the front of water hits the wheel and goes in to the pipe and since there is still the back of water in the tank as the front of the water goes into the tank there is water coming out of it. I hope it is not confusing

#### Attached Files:

• ###### Untitled.jpg
File size:
24.7 KB
Views:
170
4. May 26, 2012

### tiny-tim

hi nsv23!
no, the current is the same throughout the circuit
they're the same
it has no option

1 amp = 1 coulomb per second = 6.242*1018 electrons per second

0.01 amp is 6.242*1016 electrons per second

that's what amps mean!!

there's 6.242*1016 electrons going through the resistor, and through the wire, and through everything else in the circuit, every second

how can the resistor ignore some of them?

if a water-wheel is supposed to operate at 100 gallons per second, and you let 200 gallons per second go through the water channel, then it will either go round twice as fast, or it will break

the only way the water-wheel can "leave the rest" is to have another parallel channel (or lift the water-wheel partly out, which is the same thing), exactly like putting another resistor in parallel