Voltage and Energy and lack of directionality

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninevolt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Electric potential measures energy per charge, and the voltage at point P remains the same whether there are two equal charges Q at points A and B or a single charge 2Q at A. The potential energy of a test charge at P depends solely on the distance from the charge, leading to equal energy in both scenarios. However, the force acting on the test charge differs due to the gradient of the voltage at P, which affects how the voltage changes in that area. While the voltage values are identical, the slope of the voltage field varies, influencing the force experienced by the test charge. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between electric potential and force.
ninevolt
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
To my understanding electric potential is the measure of energy per charge.
Now what I don't understand is that the voltage at the point P will be the same if there is a positive charge Q at A and a positive charge Q at B, or if there is a positive charge 2Q at A. I don't get how a test charge at point P should have the same amount of energy in both cases. Help.
asdf.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are indeed correct that whether we have two equal charges, Q, at A and B; or a charge 2Q at A or B, the electric potential at P will be the same. It is important to emphasise that the electric potential is a measures of energy. Since the potential energy of a test charge only depends on the distance from a point charge, it isn't unreasonable that P should have the same potential energy in these two cases.

However, this does not mean that the force acting on a test charge at P would be the same. The force per unit charge at P is related to the gradient (or slope) of the potential at P, i.e. the force depends on how the voltage changes at P. So, although the value of the voltage might be the same at P, its slope may be different. Let me show you what I mean with a few plots.

This first image is when there are two equal charges, Q, located and A and B and shows the voltage (with zero at infinity).


The second is when there is a single charge, 2Q, located at A.


Notice that in both figures, you can choose any point along the line x=0, and the voltage will be equal. However, what is different is the gradient (or slope) of the voltage field. It is this that determines the force acting on a test charge. So whilst the force acting on a test charge is not the same in the two cases, the energy is.

Remember that the electric potential energy is the work done bringing a test charge from infinity, to a point in space. In this case, to a distance "r" from two charges of magnitude Q, or a distance "r" from a single charge of magnitude 2Q.

I hope that this helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well said.
 
Ok, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top