Voltage Difference Along a Path

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the voltage difference along a specified path using the electric field E. The user successfully integrates the electric field from point A to point P, addressing a division by zero issue by simplifying the expression for the integral. They confirm that the integral evaluates to 4 volts, consistent with the answer key. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the line equations for piecewise segments and resolving potential mathematical pitfalls. The user expresses confidence in their solution after receiving clarification on the simplification process.
Jake 7174
Messages
80
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Given the electric field E = (2x−y2)ax + (3z−2xy)ay + 3yaz, and the piecewise linear path joining the points A(−2,1,−1), P(2,1,−1), Q(2,3,−1) and B(2,3,1), find −∫E⋅dl from A to P − ∫E⋅dl from P to Q − ∫E⋅dl from Q to B along the straight line segments.

Homework Equations



−∫E⋅dl

(x - x1) / (x1 - x2 ) = (y - y1) / (y1 - y2 ) =(z - z1) / (z1 - z2 )

The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved this problem going direct from point a to b by using the above equation and found that the answer is 8 v. This is confirmed by the answer key. Here is my problem, when I set up the line equation to go from point A to P I get the following;

(x + 2) / (-2 - 2) = (y - 1) / (1 - 1) = (z + 1) / (-1 + 1)

or, (x + 2) / -4 = (y - 1) / 0 = (z + 1) / 0

I am ultimatley going to solve for y and z in terms of x to express my integral in terms of just x and I know how to get rid of the pesky dy and dz as well but I need the line equation to not blow up on me.

How do I resolve the division by 0? I know that the VAQ = 4 v from the solution but I am not sure what to do about the line equation.

I have an exam on Monday and I am certain a question like this will appear.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jake 7174 said:
Here is my problem, when I set up the line equation to go from point A to Q
Did you mean to write A to P?
I get the following;

(x + 2) / (-2 - 2) = (y - 1) / (1 - 1) = (z + 1) / (-1 + 1)

or, (x + 2) / -4 = (y - 1) / 0 = (z + 1) / 0

I am ultimatley going to solve for y and z in terms of x to express my integral in terms of just x and I know how to get rid of the pesky dy and dz as well but I need the line equation to not blow up on me.

How do I resolve the division by 0?

The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
 
TSny said:
Did you mean to write A to P?The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
TSny said:
Did you mean to write A to P?The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
I did mean to write A to P. I fixed it.

if y = z then dly = dlz = 0

so the expression simplifies to ##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x##
 
Jake 7174 said:
I did mean to write A to P. I fixed it.

if y = z then dly = dlz = 0

so the expression simplifies to ##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x##

If this is the case then I have
-∫ (2x - y^2) dx from x= -2 to 2 but Y =1

so, -∫ (2x - 1^2) dx = 4

This is the result I am looking for. I want to be sure I didnt luck into it and that I simplified it correctly as you suggested.
 
Jake 7174 said:
If this is the case then I have
-∫ (2x - y^2) dx from x= -2 to 2 but Y =1

so, -∫ (2x - 1^2) dx = 4

This is the result I am looking for. I want to be sure I didnt luck into it and that I simplified it correctly as you suggested.
That looks very good.
 
  • Like
Likes Jake 7174
TSny said:
That looks very good.
Awesome, Thanks for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top