Vortex Panel Method: Solving for \theta_{ij}

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Vortex
AI Thread Summary
The vortex panel method uses a specific equation to calculate vortex strength at control points, with the question arising about the value of θ_ij when i equals j. Clarifications were made regarding the original equation, noting the inclusion of cosBeta[i] and correcting the subscript on λ to [j]. The discussion highlights that both source and vortex panel methods are numerical techniques for analyzing flows over shapes, with the vortex method applicable to lifting cases. The aim is to derive the contribution of all panels to the potential at the control point. Resources and tools for implementing this method, particularly for airfoil applications, were shared for further assistance.
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
In the vortex panel method the following equation is used
<br /> V_{freestream}sin \beta_i - \sum_{j=1}^n \displaystyle\frac{\lambda_i}{2\pi} \int \displaystyle\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{dn_i} ds_j = 0

where n is the panel number, i is the control point at which the vortex strength is being calculated and j is the panel which is inducing some vortex at i, \lambda_i is the vortex strength at i and

\theta_{ij} = \arctan{\displaystyle\frac{y_i-y_j}{x_i-x_j}}

My question is what is the value of \theta_{ij} when i = j?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does anyone know? What is the value of \theta_{ij} when i = j?

For source panels I have read it is \frac{\lambda_i}{2}. But I don't know what it is for vortex panels.
 
According to my reference, your original equation is incorrect. It should have cosBeta to the right of Vfreestream. Also, the subscript on lambda should be [j], not what your equation shows.

Both source panel and vortex panel methods are numerical methods for flows over arbitrary shapes. But because the source panel method has zero circulation it only applies to non-lifting cases. Vortex panel method can be used for lifting cases. The idea behind both methods is to treat the surface as if it were a streamline, i.e. a physical surface does not exist, it is replaced by a flow line. A source panel achieves this by balancing the dynamic pressure of the onrushing flow with an infinitesimal flow source on a surface, which exerts an outward pressure against it. Like air hockey. The table is a set of source panels balancing the weight per unit area of the puck. But try to imagine this system without the table (the table doesn't exist), just the sources. And the puck is the freestream airflow impinging on the source panels.

To answer your question, at least attempt to, these methods are numerical. To obtain a solution for i = j is the whole point of the method. The solution is physically the contribution of all the panels to the potential at the control point of the ith panel.

Just out of curiosity, what are you applying this method to?
 
Last edited:
You may want to check out the resources listed here:

http://www.aae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads.html

In particular, see the online utility posted by Professor Kevin Jones of the Naval Postgraduate School:

http://www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/online_tools/panel/about/

He even posts his source code (in FORTRAN). If all else fails, perhaps running your question by him might provide an answer.

Regards,


DuncanM
http://www.rocketscientists.ca/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
InfernoSun said:
According to my reference, your original equation is incorrect. It should have cosBeta to the right of Vfreestream. Also, the subscript on lambda should be [j], not what your equation shows.

Ya, I realized that a few days after posting the question

Just out of curiosity, what are you applying this method to?

To airfoils. To be more precise, I am trying to create a Java program to implement this method.
Thank you for the reply.
 
DuncanM said:
You may want to check out the resources listed here:

http://www.aae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads.html

In particular, see the online utility posted by Professor Kevin Jones of the Naval Postgraduate School:

http://www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/online_tools/panel/about/

He even posts his source code (in FORTRAN). If all else fails, perhaps running your question by him might provide an answer.

Regards,


DuncanM
http://www.rocketscientists.ca/

Thank you for the links. The second one is very helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top