Vout of non-inverting adder circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter leroyjenkens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adder Circuit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the output voltage expression for a non-inverting adder circuit involving operational amplifiers. Participants are exploring the relationship between input voltages and resistances in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to apply voltage divider principles and op-amp rules to derive the output voltage expression. Questions arise regarding the correct use of resistors and the relationship between input voltages and the op-amp inputs.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the assumptions about the voltage at the op-amp inputs and the conditions under which the circuit operates. There is a focus on clarifying the setup and ensuring the correct interpretation of the circuit elements, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific voltage values and saturation conditions, indicating practical experimentation with the circuit. There are discussions about the limitations of the op-amp and the need for feedback voltage to avoid saturation.

leroyjenkens
Messages
621
Reaction score
49

Homework Statement



I need to derive this expression v_{out}=\frac{1}{2}(v_{1}-v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}+R_{2}}{R_{3}})

Using the circuit I'm given. I uploaded it.



The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have v_{in}=v_{+}+v_{-} which is from "rule #2 of op amps", which is "The feedback in the op-amp circuit drives the voltage differences between the inverting and non-inverting inputs to zero."

And since the circuit looks like a voltage divider, I can use the voltage divider equation to get v_{out}=v_{in}(\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}), which gives me v_{out}=(v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{2}}{R_{1}+R_{2}}), but I can't figure out why there's a \frac{1}{2} in front of the equation that I'm given at the beginning, or why the term with the resistors is the inverse of mine.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 520
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't even imagine how you came up with your "voltage divider".

Start from the + input pin of the op amp. What is that voltage in terms of v1 and v2?
 
rude man said:
I can't even imagine how you came up with your "voltage divider".

Start from the + input pin of the op amp. What is that voltage in terms of v1 and v2?

I think I used the wrong resistors. I meant to use R2 and R3. That would be a voltage divider, right?

The voltage at the + input pin has to be zero, so v_1=-v_2
 
leroyjenkens said:
I think I used the wrong resistors. I meant to use R2 and R3. That would be a voltage divider, right?

The voltage at the + input pin has to be zero, so v_1=-v_2

But, but ... v1 and v2 are your inputs! They can be anything you want so long as the amplifier's limits are not exceeded. In this case, the + and - op amp inputs must be between -8 and +8V, approximately, depending on the particular op amp type and the power supplies.

In other words - no, the + input does not have to be zero. It just has to be the same as the - input.
 
We built this in a lab and I found that v1 and v2 were both 3.55, and the saturation was 14.06. And to make this equation true: v_{out}=2(v_{1}+v_{2}) I needed R3 to be 1 ohm and R2 to be 3 ohms.

So vout has to be equal to vin and I calculate what that is across the voltage divider at the bottom? So v_{out}=2(v_{1}+v_{2}) and v_{in}=(v_{1}+v_{2})
And vin across the voltage divider is (v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}}{R_{3}+R_{2}})

And I have no idea how to turn that into this: v_{out}=\frac{1}{2}(v_{1}+v_{2})(\frac{R_{3}+R_{2}}{R_{3}})
 
You say you "found" that v1 and v2 were both 3.55V? How did those voltages get there?

Are we talking about the right circuit in the first place?

If we are, you need to answer the above question and the one I asked before, to wit, what is the voltage at the + input of the amplifier?

Don't proceed until you have answered those two questions.
 
rude man said:
You say you "found" that v1 and v2 were both 3.55V? How did those voltages get there?

Are we talking about the right circuit in the first place?

If we are, you need to answer the above question and the one I asked before, to wit, what is the voltage at the + input of the amplifier?

Don't proceed until you have answered those two questions.

That was the voltage I supplied to both v1 and v2 to which point it saturated at 14.06.

Yeah, I built this circuit on a protoboard.

The voltage at the + input would be v1 + v2, would it not? , and the voltage at the - input would also be v1 + v2, right?
 
leroyjenkens said:
That was the voltage I supplied to both v1 and v2 to which point it saturated at 14.06.

Yeah, I built this circuit on a protoboard.

The voltage at the + input would be v1 + v2, would it not?
No. If v1 = v2 there is no current in either R1 so how can the midpoint, which is the + input to the op amp, be 7.1V?

, and the voltage at the - input would also be v1 + v2, right?
[/quote]

If your output is saturated it is no longer true that the + and - inputs are the same. So not only is the - input not v1 + v2, it isn't even the same as the + input.

The reason the output is saturated is that there is insufficient fedback voltage.
The feedback voltage is Vout*R3/(R2+R3). I would say make R3/(R2+R3) at least 0.5. You neeed to make this ratio high enough to bring the output out of saturation. Either that or reduce your input voltages.

What are R1, R2 and R3 anyway?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K