W=z^n- transformation in complex space

AI Thread Summary
The transformation w = z^n conserves angles in the complex plane at all points except for zero, due to its holomorphic nature and non-zero derivative. However, at infinity, the situation changes; the Riemann sphere requires a different local coordinate system to analyze the behavior of the function. In this context, infinity is treated as zero using the coordinate 1/z, leading to a loss of angle preservation. Thus, while the function maintains its properties near finite points, it does not do so at infinity. The discussion highlights the importance of local coordinates in understanding transformations in complex analysis.
omri3012
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hallo,

When i regard complex function,

Why does the transformation w=zn don't "conserve" angels when

z go to infinity?

Thanks
Omri
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
On the complex plane, at every point except for 0 the function w(z) = zn conserves angles because it's holomorphic with derivative non-zero. So it doesn't matter 'how close' to infinity you are, it's still angle preserving. But on the Riemann sphere, at the point infinity, you have to look at it in a different local coordinate in order to take the derivative. Canonically the coordinate is 1/z, so the point infinity is locally considered 0. In this case AT infinity the function won't preserve angles
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top