Walking sinusoidal as you follow a RF Standing Wave?

jmatejka
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
A friend who was in Civil Air Patrol once told me he was using some RF Locator equipment and was "homing in" on a target.

His walking path to the target was sinusoidal because of the wavelength of the frequency used. He said he was literally walking the wave....

Standing wave, I assume?

Or was his imagination getting the better of him?

Is this possible with the right frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EM waves travel in straight line (unless they are continuously being reflected/refracted/scattered) and not sinusoidal. If you want to follow an EM wave you have to travel in straight line with the speed of light. The sinusoidal shape you see in a graphical representation of wave is representing the amplitudes of the electric and/or magnetic field at the various points in space, it is not how the EM wave travels in space.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
A standing wave is not propagating...It's a stationary oscillation of the object (of the magnetic and electric field in case of EM waves).
Then what Delta2 said
 
ChrisVer said:
A standing wave is not propagating...It's a stationary oscillation of the object (of the magnetic and electric field in case of EM waves).
Then what Delta2 said

That standing wave is between 2 points? Could it be between a transmitter and a mountain, water tower, etc, etc?

The nodes are/or can be fixed in that stationary oscillation?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top