Walking sinusoidal as you follow a RF Standing Wave?

jmatejka
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
A friend who was in Civil Air Patrol once told me he was using some RF Locator equipment and was "homing in" on a target.

His walking path to the target was sinusoidal because of the wavelength of the frequency used. He said he was literally walking the wave....

Standing wave, I assume?

Or was his imagination getting the better of him?

Is this possible with the right frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EM waves travel in straight line (unless they are continuously being reflected/refracted/scattered) and not sinusoidal. If you want to follow an EM wave you have to travel in straight line with the speed of light. The sinusoidal shape you see in a graphical representation of wave is representing the amplitudes of the electric and/or magnetic field at the various points in space, it is not how the EM wave travels in space.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
A standing wave is not propagating...It's a stationary oscillation of the object (of the magnetic and electric field in case of EM waves).
Then what Delta2 said
 
ChrisVer said:
A standing wave is not propagating...It's a stationary oscillation of the object (of the magnetic and electric field in case of EM waves).
Then what Delta2 said

That standing wave is between 2 points? Could it be between a transmitter and a mountain, water tower, etc, etc?

The nodes are/or can be fixed in that stationary oscillation?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top