WANTED: Formula for frictional resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the formula for calculating frictional resistance in a hydraulics lift system. A specific scenario is presented involving a ram and cylinder with given dimensions, oil viscosity, and ram travel speed. The proposed formula for resistance is Rf = 0.97 x Cf x Sw x V^2, but there is uncertainty about its applicability since the fluid involved is oil, not water. The user expresses a desire for clarification on whether the formula is suitable for their problem. The conversation highlights the need for accurate formulas in hydraulic systems to determine frictional resistance effectively.
clueless
I do remember you folks to like to see where I left things. Well, let's change the arrangement. Give me formula and I will do the rest.

A hydraulics lift (type commonly used for greasing automobile) consist of a 10.111-in-diameter ram that slides in a 10.006-in-diameter cylinder. The annual space being filled with oil having a kinematic viscocity of 0.0038 ft^2/sec and specific gravity of 0.83. If the rate of travel of the ram v is 0.5fps, find the frictional resistance, F when 6ft of the ram is engaged in the cylinder...

I think this is simply evaluating expression problem once the expression is known to me. Am I underestimating the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you are looking for?

Rf = 0.97 x Cf x Sw x V^2 where:

Rf = Resistance in pounds
Cf = Coefficient of friction
Sw = Wetted surface
V = Velocity in ft/sec
0.97 = Constant for fresh water

Source: http://www.greenval.com/shape_part1.html
 
I am not sure whether I have the formula I was looking for because the fluid in my problem is oil not the water. I will check out the website you were referring to. Thanks for your time and kindness.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top