Was does it mean if one views the wave function as "real"?

In summary, the discussion is about the interpretation of the wave function being real and whether that means it has physical meaning. The MW interpretation suggests that the wave function exists in other worlds. However, this raises questions about how this applies to subatomic particles, as viewing the wave function as real could imply that they are physically smeared out before measurement. There is also a caution about delving too deeply into this concept.
  • #1
ajv
15
0
In interpretations where the wave function is real, what does that mean? does it mean that the wave function has physical meaning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ajv said:
In interpretations where the wave function is real, what does that mean? does it mean that the wave function has physical meaning?
Yes. You can view that as in the MW interpretation where most of the wavefuntion ends up in other worlds.
 
  • #3
Bruno81 said:
Yes. You can view that as in the MW interpretation where most of the wavefuntion ends up in other worlds.
But about electrons and sub atomic particles? If one says the wave function is real does that mean that they view electrons as physically smeared out prior to measurement?
 
  • #4
ajv said:
But about electrons and sub atomic particles? If one says the wave function is real does that mean that they view electrons as physically smeared out prior to measurement?

You can, IF you view the wave function as real, but that's a very big "if" (and if you want to dig deeper into this area than is wise you can try googling for "psi-ontic quantum", but don't say you weren't warned).

Be sure to read and understand the replies in your other thread about the limits of this "smear" notion.
 

1. What is a wave function?

A wave function is a mathematical representation of the quantum state of a particle or system. It describes the probability of finding the particle in a certain location or state at a given time.

2. How is the wave function interpreted?

The wave function is interpreted differently depending on the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some view it as a description of the physical reality of a particle, while others see it as a mathematical tool for making predictions.

3. What does it mean to view the wave function as "real"?

Viewing the wave function as "real" means that one believes it represents an objective reality and describes the physical state of a particle or system. This interpretation is often associated with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

4. What are the implications of viewing the wave function as "real"?

Viewing the wave function as "real" has implications for our understanding of the nature of reality and the role of measurement in quantum systems. It also has implications for the concept of determinism and the role of the observer in quantum phenomena.

5. Is there evidence to support the view of the wave function as "real"?

There is ongoing debate and research regarding the interpretation of quantum mechanics and the nature of the wave function. Some experiments, such as the double-slit experiment, have been interpreted as evidence for the physical reality of the wave function, while others argue that the wave function is simply a mathematical tool and does not have an objective reality.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
480
Replies
1
Views
629
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
445
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
259
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
61
Views
1K
Back
Top