Was the housing bubble caused by a lack of regulation and low interest rates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubble housing
AI Thread Summary
The housing bubble was primarily driven by the belief that home prices would continue to rise, rather than a lack of regulation alone. Reckless lending practices, such as no-ratio loans, allowed borrowers to take on mortgages without declaring income, leading to the issuance of credit that should not have been approved. This irresponsible lending was exacerbated by the ability to bundle and sell loans, which removed liability from lenders and diminished their incentive to practice responsible lending. The influx of easy credit artificially inflated home prices, as more buyers entered the market due to lower mortgage payments resulting from low interest rates. These low rates, influenced by the Federal Reserve's policies following the dot-com crash, created a perception of prosperity, masking the reality of accumulating debt. The discussion highlights the interplay between lending practices, market psychology, and economic policy in the formation of the housing bubble.
kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
Is it true that the housing bubble was created because the housing market was practically 100% unregulated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it was because people believed that house prices would keep going up.
 
A great number of loans were issued due to reckless lending practices that came about because there wasn't sufficient regulation. What caused the housing bubble was credit that never should have been issued.

...PAUL SOLMAN: Andrews applied for, and got, a no-ratio loan, in which his $2,500 monthly payments would consume nearly all his take-home pay.

No-ratio?

EDMUND ANDREWS: A no-ratio mortgage in which literally I left the income space blank.

PAUL SOLMAN: Therefore, there would be no ratio.

EDMUND ANDREWS: Correct, yes, because there was an issue of my debt-to-income ratio. But if you don't have any income that you're declaring, you have no debt-to-income ratio. Problem solved. Even at the time, I'm going, "I can't believe this. Is this a great country or what?"...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june09/andrews_05-21.html

From there, loans could be bundled and sold, thereby relieving the original lender of any liability. This left no incentive for lenders to adhere to responsible lending practices - you could just pass the poison to someone else. The end result was to artificially flood the market with easy credit, thus driving up home prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There were intelligent mortgage shoppers, and non-intelligent mortgage shoppers. There were many crooked mortgage brokers that only cared about getting their commision for selling the mortgage and sold them to stupid and/or greedy people. No different from selling someone anything they can't afford, like an expensive car, boat, etc... When I got my first house, I believe the rule was that your mortgage payment couldn't total more than 28% of your NET pay.

caveat emptor
 
House prices hve gone down in a lot of countries with different legal and banking systems.

http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/assets/img/JUN01_PR1.gif

(http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kasse said:
Is it true that the housing bubble was created because the housing market was practically 100% unregulated?

Other than some of the above, talking of the housing market break-over, the sale value of property is dictated in large part by the size of the mortgage payment. Low interest rates reduced the size of the required mortgage payments bringing a larger pool of buyers to the market. The greater number of buyers inflated the price of housing.

The period of low interest rates during this time was brought about by the Federal Reserve Banking System directing the prime interest rate through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_market_operations" , to extremely low values, in the wake of the dot-com crash, in efforts to support US corporate value and productivity through the availability of low interest rate corporate loans.

In perception, readily available cash and credit were perceived by the vast majority as a sign of prosperity, where real property investments could be made with a sure income, rather than correctly perceived as a period of accumulating dept. (This sort of dept will be paid off through taxation and currency devaluation.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top