Water's Property: Droplets Stay Stuck in Inverted Tumbler

  • Thread starter Thread starter Milind_shyani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Water
AI Thread Summary
When a stainless steel tumbler is inverted after being filled with water, droplets remain stuck to the walls due to surface tension. This phenomenon is influenced by the contact angle between the water and the tumbler material; a lower contact angle allows water to cling more effectively. In contrast, if mercury were used instead of water, it would not adhere to the tumbler due to its high contact angle with steel. Understanding these principles highlights the interplay between surface tension and material properties. The discussion emphasizes that surface tension is not the sole factor; contact angle also plays a crucial role.
Milind_shyani
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi
When we fill a tumbler( of stainless steel) with water and then invert it ie empty it . The tumbler gets empty except a few drops of water. even if you keep the tumbler inverted for hours the water droplets do not fall down they remain stuck to the walls of the tumbler.
I hope you all reply soon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi - you didn't ask any questions there, but the effect you are talking about is surface tension...
 
russ_watters said:
Hi - you didn't ask any questions there, but the effect you are talking about is surface tension...

Hi
I know what surface tension is but is this the only reason for it
 
A little bit more. This phenomenon depends on the contact angle between water and the tumbler material as well. For example, if you test with Hg instead of water, there must be no Hg held in the tumbler any more. The contact angle of Hg against steel is too high.
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

What Happens to Water Pressure in a Glass When Inverted?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Cleaning of the finned tubes on gas cooler without disassembling
Replies
7
Views
2K
Steel I Beam Falling Through Water
Replies
18
Views
2K
Plumbing Compressed air powered water pressure
Replies
39
Views
14K
Cylinder filled with water deflection study
Replies
20
Views
3K
Can I save anything in my greenhouse from frost damage?
Replies
11
Views
2K
When should I add ice to hot water for the lowest final temperature?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Effect of freefall on hydrostatic/atmospheric pressure
Replies
8
Views
5K
Behaviour of a ping pong ball dropped in a can full of water.
Replies
1
Views
6K
Heat transfer from water in a stainless steel pipe: analysis
Replies
9
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top