Water's Surprising True Color: Blue

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the color of water, specifically whether its blueness is an intrinsic property of water itself or primarily a result of light scattering. Participants explore various perspectives on the nature of water's color, touching on both theoretical and observational aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that water has a faint intrinsic blueness due to molecular vibrations, particularly involving OH bonds, rather than solely relying on light scattering.
  • Others argue that the observed color of water is significantly influenced by scattering, similar to how the sky appears blue, and question whether the color is truly intrinsic.
  • A participant mentions personal observations of water appearing bluer in certain locations, such as Hawaii, and after filtration, indicating potential variability in water color.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of depth on color perception, with divers noting that red materials appear less red at greater depths, which may relate to how water's color is perceived.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and distinctions between absorption and scattering, suggesting that both processes contribute to the perceived color of water.
  • A suggestion is made to use a spectrometer to analyze water's color definitively, highlighting a desire for empirical evidence in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether water's color is intrinsic or primarily due to scattering. Multiple competing views remain, with some advocating for the intrinsic property perspective and others emphasizing the scattering effect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complex interactions of light with water, and there are unresolved questions regarding definitions of intrinsic properties versus effects of scattering and absorption.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,462
Reaction score
8,717
I feel silly asking this question because I thought I knew all about this.

A friend of mine told me that water is actually blue. i.e. its blueness is not merely a matter of preferential scattering (the usual explanation), but that the chemical that is water is actually (very faintly) blue. He said that the colour comes from the interactions of light with the atomic (or was it molecular?) bonds. He also said that water is virtually unique in this regard, all other substances that have colour do not have it this property.

This is very much against my understanding but I have a lot of faith of him.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~etrnsfer/water.htm
 
An informative article mgb. On the other hand, what would the nice picture of a lake, at the top of the website look like, reflecting an orange sky? Gray-brown, I think.
 
http://www.timelysnow.com/2007/05/11/so-i-guess-qing-%E9%9D%92-really-is-blue/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting! And might I say, I knew it! All of these years I was told otherwise, but while on one our trips to Hawaii, I had convinced myself that the color of the water could not be a result of scattered light only. In fact there must be something about the water in the middle of the pacific or around the islands that [at times?] makes it even bluer than normal.

This has really bugged me for a long time.

The other thing that I've noticed is the water from our well system. The water in our area is pretty bad, so I put in a premium filtration system. When the system is operating at peak performance, which is most of the time, and we fill the bathtub, the water is obviously blue. It never looked blue before we put in the new system.
 
Last edited:
Are there any scuba divers in the house? With increasing depth, Red colored materials appears less red.
 
Phrak said:
Are there any scuba divers in the house? With increasing depth, Red colored materials appears less red.

I am a diver.

There is no question that lots of water appears blue. The question is whether this colour is an intrinsic property of the material or an effect of scattering.

As a counter-example: the sky appears blue too, but it is not because air is blue.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I am a diver.

There is no question that lots of water appears blue. The question is whether this colour is an intrinsic property of the material or an effect of scattering.

As a counter-example: the sky appears blue too, but it is not because air is blue.

Doh! I missed that. I'm not sure I'd use the word intrinsic, though. The distinctions are absorption-->heat vs. scattering or absorption-->reemission, no?
 
  • #10
I was always told that the water was simply reflecting the scattered light from the "blue sky". Dave, you are suggesting the scattering of blue light within the water itself?
 
  • #11
I've heard this before too and I think that water appears blue because of both of the ideas mentioned, i.e. it appears strongly blue on a clear day with clear water because it is very slightly blue itself and from preferential scattering.

Phrasing it as 'water is clear with a blue tinge' would probably be better than 'water is very slightly blue' may be better. I haven't followed up the idea fully though as I had (and still have) other things in my main trains of thought :)
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
I was always told that the water was simply reflecting the scattered light from the "blue sky". Dave, you are suggesting the scattering of blue light within the water itself?
Well, there's no question that, at depth, everything is very blue. It's certainly not an issue of reflecting the sky.


Read the article mgb_phys gave in post #2. It is quite informative.

In particular, note the empirical results in the photo below the graphs. Regardless of what explanation you like, it will have to explain that.


In a nutshell, the article explains that - while virtually ever other colour seen in nature is the result of photon-electron interaction - the colour of water is virtually unique in that it is the result of molecular vibration stemmnig from the preponderance of OH bonds.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Its the same as glass, its inherently transparent looking through it, but if you turned it around and looked through the thick of it, it appears green.

Anyway can't we just chuck some water in a spectrometer once and for all to finalise this?
 
  • #14
Using the word "scattering" as the centerpiece doesn't frame the issue correctly, since water (and any blue object) also "scatters" blue light. That's what diffuse reflection is. Ie, water most certainly is blue because it "scatters" blue light, but that's only half the answer. The other half is that it absorbs other wavelengths. The difference then iis that the water absorbs the other wavelengths and the air does not.
 
  • #15
Phrak said:
An informative article mgb. On the other hand, what would the nice picture of a lake, at the top of the website look like, reflecting an orange sky? Gray-brown, I think.
How does one acquire an orange sky? On a cloudy day, the sky is white/gray and the water is still blue (just darker).
 
  • #16
mgb_phys said:
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~etrnsfer/water.htm

Very interesting. I always thought that the color of the sky was the one that determined the one of the sea, and that water was transparent.
 
  • #17
fluidistic said:
Very interesting. I always thought that the color of the sky was the one that determined the one of the sea, and that water was transparent.

We're not just talking about looking at water from the surface though. Looking through water at-depth is also blue, but has nothing to do with reflection from the sky.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K