Wave Equation, stuck on a partial calculation

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Hey everybody,

My professor started our PDE I class in Chapter six, so I am having a hard time with the really basic stuff to get the theory down.

One of my questions to answer is to verify a solution by using direct substitution.

u(x,t) \ = \ \frac{1}{2}\left[\phi(x+t) \ + \ \phi(x-t) \right] \ + \ \frac{1}{2} \int^{x+t}_{x-t}\Psi(s)ds

With initial conditions

u(x,t_{0}) = \phi(x) \ , \ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} (x,t_{0}) = \Psi(x), \ and \ t_{0} = 0

satisfies \frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial x^{2}} - \frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial t^{2}} = 0

It was easy for me to plug and chug to show that u(x,t_{0}) = \phi(x) \ and \ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} (x,t_{0}) = \Psi(x)

Clearly my next step is to find \frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial x^{2}}

but that's the step on which I'm stuck. Can someone get me started? If someone can show me how to do the second partial w.r.t x, it would be a good exercise for me to figure out the second partial w.r.t t. I apply the chain rule and just get a bunch of garbage back, which means I'm messing it up somewhere.

Any input is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need "Leibniz' formula":
\frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \phi(x,t)dt= \frac{d\beta}{dx}\phi(x,\beta(x))- \frac{d\alpha}{dx}\phi(x,\alpha(x))+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}dt

It's really just applying the chain rule correctly.
 
<br /> \frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \phi(x,t)dt= \frac{d\beta}{dx}\phi(x,\beta(x))- \frac{d\alpha}{dx}\phi(x,\alpha(x))+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}dt<br />

I'm having trouble understanding this. It looks like the integrand you gave is a function of 2 variables, but the integrand I have is a function of one variable. I'm not sure what to do with that.

Also:
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (\phi(x+t)) = ?

is it = \phi &#039;(x + t), \ or \ \phi_{x}(x+t) \ ?

In the notation of a function, how do I write that? I guess I'm having a notational brain fart.
 
Last edited:
I found this worked out in Walter Strauss's book, so I guess I don't need help anymore. Thanks for looking :)
 
Somefantastik said:
<br /> \frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \phi(x,t)dt= \frac{d\beta}{dx}\phi(x,\beta(x))- \frac{d\alpha}{dx}\phi(x,\alpha(x))+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}dt<br />

I'm having trouble understanding this. It looks like the integrand you gave is a function of 2 variables, but the integrand I have is a function of one variable. I'm not sure what to do with that.
In that case,
\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x}= 0
and the formula becomes
\frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \phi(x,t)dt= \frac{d\beta}{dx}\phi(x,\beta(x))- \frac{d\alpha}{dx}\phi(x,\alpha(x))

Also:
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (\phi(x+t)) = ?

is it = \phi &#039;(x + t), \ or \ \phi_{x}(x+t) \ ?

In the notation of a function, how do I write that? I guess I'm having a notational brain fart.
Use the chain rule. If \phi&#039;(u) is the derivative of \phi as a function of the single variable u, then
\frac{\partial\phi(x+t)}{\partial x}= \phi&#039;(x+t)(1)= \phi&#039;(x+t)
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top