Wave Function in specific range

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the periodic sawtooth function defined as f(x) = x/2∏ for 0<x<2∏, with periodicity extending across all real numbers. The confusion arises regarding the function's value at x = 4∏, where it is stated that y = 1, despite the expectation that it would yield f(8∏). It is clarified that the function is not defined at the endpoints x = 0 and x = 2∏, making those values irrelevant for calculations like the Fourier Series. The periodic nature means that f(4∏) effectively returns to the value of f(2∏), which is 1, thus explaining the result. Understanding the function's definition and periodicity is crucial for resolving such queries.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
I obtained the following from a book.

Question is:

Periodic Sawtooth described by the following;

f(x) = x/2∏ for 0<x<2∏
f(x+2∏) = f(x) for -∞<x<+∞


The solution is:

If x = 0
y = 0

If x = 2∏
y = 2∏/2∏ = 1

If x = 4∏
y = f(2∏+2∏) = 2∏ = 1

Can anyone explain to me why when x = 4∏ y = 1 ? I'm not clear on that bit.

I would just think if you're putting x = 4∏ into the 2nd equation in the question you would get y = f(4∏+4∏) = f(8∏)

I know a full rotation is 2 ∏, so I can see how 8∏ would be the same as 2∏, but then how did they go from 2∏ to 1 in the part above which I have emboldened?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You were given f(x) = x/2∏ for 0<x<2∏. Your function is not defined at x = 0 or at x = 2∏. So you don't have f(0) = 0 and f(2∏) = 1. The value of a function like that at the two end points is irrelevant in calculating things like the Fourier Series so they are usually left undefined. If you insist on defining f(0)= 0, then you have no choice but to also choose f(2∏) = 0 if you want the function to be periodic.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top