Understanding Wave Functions and Non-Linear Functions in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
A wave function in quantum mechanics represents the state of a particle, detailing its position, momentum, and other properties through probabilities. It is a complex function that can be manipulated mathematically to yield real numbers associated with these probabilities. Linear wave functions allow for superposition, enabling the combination of multiple wave functions to create new states, which is fundamental to quantum mechanics. Non-linear wave functions, while more complex, provide deeper insights into particle interactions and behaviors, although they complicate the theoretical framework. Understanding both linear and non-linear functions is essential for grasping the nuances of quantum mechanics.
manzaloros
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm new (obviously) to these forums, so please direct me if I am in err.

Just a quick question: A wavefuntion is the function that determines the location of a particle (the probability) right? And what is a non-linear wavefunction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, wave functions are complex, that is they involve the square root of minus one. They determine the probability, not just for position but for momentum and other "observables" by a simple mathematical operation that turns the complex number into its "complex square", a real number that can be identified with a probability. Sorry if that seems over complicated, but it's important to be clear about wave functions if you're going to think about quantum mechanics.

Linear in this case means you can add them and subtract them. Sometimes it helps to think of the analogy of sound waves where you can add tones (say C,E, and G on the piano) to make a new sound, a chord. You can add wave functions to make a new wave function, called a superposition, and this is a basic tool of quantum mechanics. So quantum mechanics is called a linear theory, because it relies so basically on this linear property of the wave functions.

There are a lot of open questions in advanced quantum theory, and people try all kinds of modifications to see if they can answer those questions. One of the ways they have done this is to abandon the linearity, to try to use wave functions that don't add, and therefore don't form superpositions, at least not in the old simple way. So far this research program is still alive, but without superposition its hard to find things out, so it doesn't have a lot to show. Linear QM is a tremendoiusly successful theory, that explains all kinds of weird things the experimenters have come up with.
 


A wave function in quantum mechanics describes the state of a particle or system in terms of its position, momentum, and other physical properties. It is a mathematical function that represents the probability of finding a particle in a specific location or state. So, in a way, yes, it determines the location of a particle, but it also describes other important aspects of the particle's state.

A non-linear wave function, on the other hand, refers to a wave function that is not a simple linear function. In other words, its behavior is not directly proportional to its input. Non-linear functions are important in quantum mechanics because they allow for more complex and accurate descriptions of particles and their interactions. For example, the famous Schrödinger equation, which describes the behavior of quantum systems, is a non-linear equation.

It's important to note that while linear functions are simpler and easier to work with, non-linear functions are necessary for understanding and predicting the behavior of particles at the quantum level. They allow for more nuanced and accurate descriptions of quantum systems and their behavior. So, while they may be more complicated, they are crucial in the study of quantum mechanics.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...