Wave Packet Expansion: Physical Reason & Conservation Laws

Black Integra
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Why do wave packets expand when they evolve in time?
Is there any physical reason behind this?
Is it a conservation law of some quantities that makes it expanded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wave packet is a sum of waves with different frequencies (and wavelengths). Waves with different frequencies travel at different speeds, and this leads to dispersion. If the speed didn't depend on frequency, there would be no dispersion.

The same thing happens classically with light waves in a medium. In general, the speed of light in a medium depends on frequency, so a "white light" pulse disperses as it travels through glass, water, optical fiber, etc.
 
Thanks for that answer :) but let me ask another question.

If we consider an electron as a wave packet moving through space hitting at the step potential, theoretically, electron with low energy could sink into the potential and then jump back to the free space, or, also, be reflected back at first place.

Can we write the wave function as these wave packets(reflect + transmit)?
I mean if I can study the evolution of probability density by time of this electron and a step?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top