Wave-Particle Duality: Always Both, Never Isolated

scilover89
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Does this describe wave particle duality correctly?

'Whether observed or not, a matter's wave particle duality still persist. The wave and matter characteristic cannot be isolated: A matter cannot be a wave sometimes and particle the other times. It must be both at anytime.
However, when we observed a matter, we can only observed one of the characteristic."

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unmeasured, between the looks 'it' acts like a wave, whenever measured, you observe a particle respectively the attributes of a particle
 
The axioms of Quantum Mechanics do not use any of the words "wave" or "particle".The physical system is described by mathematical objects:coordinates and momenta,classical Hamiltonian,angular momentum,etc.

Both "particle" and "wave" are mathematical models.

Daniel.
 
http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~zgap118/3/

http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~zgap118/4/

BJ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Terry Giblin said:
If you then drill two holes on one side of the box, an interference pattern will start to form outside the box and eventually an electron will still appear from the other side of the box. (Quantum electron-wave boxes)

Have you ever seen an interference pattern from a unique electron? If yes please tell me, the energy momentum conservation law is no more valid!

Seratend.

P.S. Please try to use a minimum of the usual physical language in your posts. I have never heard about a mathematical model of clouds in QM. (This is not a meteo forum).
 
We are publishing an experimental result which goes in the direction of a geometrical interpretation of quantum mechanic: there is a particle and there is a wave. This result, if confirmed, shows that a particle (electron in our case) has an internal clock frequency in its rest frame nu0=m0c2/h, as conjectured by Louis de Broglie as early as 1924. The paper will be published in a few monthes in “Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie”. It can be read on my site http://www.freewebs.com/raphaelzorgue/index.htm .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Back
Top