Wave propagation velocity in solids

AI Thread Summary
To find details on the velocity of propagation of mechanical waves in solids, resources in continuum mechanics, geology, and acousto-optics are recommended. Both transverse (shear) and longitudinal (compression) waves exist, each exhibiting distinct velocities. Understanding these differences is crucial for applications in fields such as seismic activity and device technology. The complexity of wave propagation in solids necessitates a thorough exploration of these topics. Comprehensive texts in the mentioned fields will provide the necessary insights.
kthouz
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
Hi!
Can some one give me a link where i can find details about finding the velocity of propagation of a mechanical wave in a solid? (i think this wave must be a transverse one)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any decent continuum mechanics text will discuss this. Ditto geology texts, in the context of earthquakes and seismic activity. Acousto-optics will also deal with this, in the context of certain devices.

The situation is more complex than you may think- there are both transverse (shear) and longitudinal (compression) waves, each with their own velocity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top