Wavefunction/eigenfunction and eigen states?

  • Thread starter Thread starter new_986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States
new_986
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody...
I have two questions about what I couldn't understand in quantum physics:

1- could anyone tell me please what is different between wavefunctions, eigenfunctions and eigen states?

2- what is different between Operator and eigenvalue?

thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you should review some basic QM.

1) The wavefunction of a particle is a probability amplitude distribution for that particle. An Eigenfunction is a specific function which solves the time-independent Schrodinger's equation. In general, a wavefunction may not be an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian; it could be a superposition of eigenfunctions. An eigenstate is similar to an eigenfunction, except it may not be a "function" per say. It could be like a spinor or something else. Eigenstate is a more general term.

2) Any operator has a set of eigenvalues associated with it. For example, the momentum operator p may have a discrete or continuous set of eigenvalues associated with it depending on the set up of the problem. The operator is p, the eigenvalues are what values you may find upon measuring p.
 
Matterwave said:
It seems you should review some basic QM.

1) The wavefunction of a particle is a probability amplitude distribution for that particle. An Eigenfunction is a specific function which solves the time-independent Schrodinger's equation. In general, a wavefunction may not be an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian; it could be a superposition of eigenfunctions. An eigenstate is similar to an eigenfunction, except it may not be a "function" per say. It could be like a spinor or something else. Eigenstate is a more general term.

2) Any operator has a set of eigenvalues associated with it. For example, the momentum operator p may have a discrete or continuous set of eigenvalues associated with it depending on the set up of the problem. The operator is p, the eigenvalues are what values you may find upon measuring p.

Thanks Dear Matterwave, could you please recommend me a reference what explain the basics of QM? I'm sorry if I bother you...
 
I recommend Griffith's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top