A Wavefunction of the Universe considering all possible boundaries?

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Are there any models or theories of "many worlds/histories" that consider a sum over all possible boundary conditions?
The Hawking-Hartle no boundary condition is well known. The authors considered a many worlds/histories model considering a sum over all compact euclidean metrics.

But are there any models or theories that consider a sum over all possible metrics or boundaries?

And finally, if all possible boundaries are considered, does it mean that the different worlds/histories considered in the model would be described by radically different fundamental laws of physics?
 
  • Like
Likes AlexCaledin
Physics news on Phys.org
No, there are no models or theories that consider a sum over all possible metrics or boundaries. The Hawking-Hartle no boundary condition does not consider the sum of all possible metrics or boundaries, but instead assumes that the universe obeys the same fundamental laws of physics everywhere. This means that the different worlds/histories considered in the model will be described by the same fundamental laws of physics.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top