Wavefunction really like a wave?

  • Thread starter Thread starter venton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wavefunction
venton
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Is the wavefunction of a particle really shaped like a wave? A lot of analogies are made about how the wave function is like a water wave which can interfere with other waves.
But does the schrodinger equation truly produce something shaped like a wave (ie a 3d sine wave) when plotted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particle localized in a finite box gives 3d sine waves.
 
Thanks. How come that when a photon goes through a single slit that the wavefunction doesn't spread out, and the particle appears randomly anywhere along the spread out wave?
Instead it appears to go through the slit as a particle and appears as single spot.
I am imagining there is literally one slit here, not two.
 
Whether there is a single open slit or a double-slit setup, there will be an interference pattern due to a single particle (e.g. photon) as long as the setup has no detector to find out where the particle is until the end of the experiment. For the single slit case, if you measure the position of the particle the waveform describing it is changed such that the diffractive interference effects are diminished. The resulting uncertainty in the momentum means there is a spread in the possible ending position of the particle...just that it'll look more like a lump rather than and inferference pattern. Going the other way, the less precisely we detemine the position of the particle passing through the slit, the greater the resulting diffractive interference effects.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top