Wavelength and Fundamental Frequency of Standing Wave on 2m String

AI Thread Summary
A standing wave on a 2-meter string resonates at 400 Hz with three antinodes, leading to a discussion about its wavelength and fundamental frequency. Initially, there was confusion regarding the wavelength, with one participant suggesting it was 2 meters, but it was later corrected to 4/3 meters. The fundamental frequency was clarified through the definition and by visualizing the string's vibration at its fundamental frequency, which has a wavelength of 4 meters. The fundamental frequency was calculated using the formula fn = v/λn, where the wave speed was derived from the frequency and corrected wavelength. This discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the wavelength to find the fundamental frequency.
pooka
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
A standing wave resonates at 400 Hz with three antinodes on a string tied tightly between two posts 2.0 meters apart.
What is the wavelength of this standing wave?
What is the fundamental frequency of this string?

I tried to draw the picture out, and it looks like the wavelength is just 2.0 m? I am not sure how to find the fundamental frequency though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pooka,

pooka said:
A standing wave resonates at 400 Hz with three antinodes on a string tied tightly between two posts 2.0 meters apart.
What is the wavelength of this standing wave?
What is the fundamental frequency of this string?

I tried to draw the picture out, and it looks like the wavelength is just 2.0 m?

Before dealing with the fundamental frequency, I don't believe this wavelength is correct. If you look at it again, do you see what it is? Or if not, why did you choose 2m as the wavelength?
 
alphysicist said:
Hi pooka,



Before dealing with the fundamental frequency, I don't believe this wavelength is correct. If you look at it again, do you see what it is? Or if not, why did you choose 2m as the wavelength?

I chose this wavelength because when I drew the wave out, the post is 2 metres apart, so I thought that the wavelenght would also be 2 metres.
 
Okay I just redrew the wave. Is the wavelength 4/3 metres then?
 
pooka said:
Okay I just redrew the wave. Is the wavelength 4/3 metres then?

That sounds right to me.

For your question in your original post, what is the definition of the fundamental frequency? Try drawing this string vibrating in its fundamental frequency (instead of the frequency they give you). Can you find its wavelength in that case? Does that help you find its frequency?
 
alphysicist said:
That sounds right to me.

For your question in your original post, what is the definition of the fundamental frequency? Try drawing this string vibrating in its fundamental frequency (instead of the frequency they give you). Can you find its wavelength in that case? Does that help you find its frequency?

Is the fundamental frequency wavelength 4 m then?
 
pooka said:
Is the fundamental frequency wavelength 4 m then?

Yes, that is the wavelength when it vibrates at its fundamental frequency.
 
thanks!
 
Sure, glad to help! (Just to be sure I understood the wording in one of your posts, you did use that 4m wavelength to find the fundamental frequency, right?)
 
  • #10
alphysicist said:
Sure, glad to help! (Just to be sure I understood the wording in one of your posts, you did use that 4m wavelength to find the fundamental frequency, right?)

Yup! The fundamental frequency is given by fn = v/λn.
I first found v by using the v = fλ where f is the 400 Hz times the wavelength 4/3

Then I divided the v by 4.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top