Hi there!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What is meant by saying that a photon of smaller wavelength can resolve smaller distances?

I know from scattering theory that the form factor is the Fourier transform of the charge distribution and that knowing the form factor at high momentum transfers gives a better overall picture of the distribution. But without information from measurements at long wavelengths, the distribution can't be reconstructed either, can it?

I also know the "argument" using the uncertainty relation. But the UR connects the typical length scale and momentum uncertainty of one single wavefunction but in this context it is used in the way that [itex]\Delta x[/itex] is related to the target's extension whereas [itex]\Delta p[/itex] is the photon's momentum. I simply don't get it.

Thanks to you all!

ledamage

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wavelength and resolution

Loading...

Similar Threads for Wavelength resolution | Date |
---|---|

A Wavelength of the pilot wave | Jan 19, 2018 |

I Davison-Germer experiment - Bragg condition | Jan 17, 2018 |

I How energy of light is conserved when passing through medium | Dec 12, 2017 |

I Deriving resolution of the identity without Dirac notation | Apr 18, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**