Wavelength associated with the body - What does it mean?

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I was studying De Broglie Theory in which all bodies in movement have a de broglie wavelength associated with it. But what it means?
The body's speed (Vb) is different from the wave-associated speed (Vw)
Vw=λ f and Vb ≠λ f

Which wave is that? Is it the wave emitted by the body as it is in movement (by Maxwell theory if a body is moving it emits eletromagnetic waves), and in this case, is Vw = c?

[]s
John
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
After discovering that light have properties of particles, and the light particles, photons, have energy E=hf and momentum p=h/λ, the question arose if particles can have wave property with wavelength associated to their momentum p=mv: λ=h/p=h/(mv).
It is suggestive that the length of the Bohr orbits are integer multiples of the de Broglie wavelenghts.
If electron is a wave, it has to be diffracted by slits or gratings; and it does diffract on crystal lattices like X rays.
If it is a wave why not construct microscopes working with electron beams? And such microscopes are widely spread and used now.

Read http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/debrog.html

ehild
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top