Waves, dispersion, group speed

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding wave packets, dispersion, and group velocity in the context of water surface waves. The group velocity, derived from the relationship v_g = dω/dk, indicates that the modulation of wave amplitude travels faster than the individual waves themselves. Participants express frustration over the lack of clear explanations and derivations in educational resources, particularly regarding how group velocity is defined and its implications. The conversation includes attempts to clarify the mathematical foundations of wave packets and the significance of complex amplitudes in wave theory. Overall, the thread highlights a need for clearer educational materials on these complex topics in wave physics.
  • #31
I should have added the first part of the "tutorial" too so you see what is g(x) and can actually do the calculations involving equ.2 and 4 to get to equ.12. here it is:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3928

Personally, I see no mistake up to equ. 12 where the exponential term just dispears. It can't have been "incorporated" in g(x), that'd make no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
quasar987 said:
I should have added the first part of the "tutorial" too so you see what is g(x) and can actually do the calculations involving equ.2 and 4 to get to equ.12. here it is:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3928

Aha...if that is the definition of g, it exactly accounts for eq 12.

Personally, I see no mistake up to equ. 12 where the exponential term just dispears. It can't have been "incorporated" in g(x), that'd make no sense.

It does, and it is...

g(x-\omega '_0 t) e^{i(k_0 x -\omega _0 t)} = f(x-\omega '_0 t,0) e^{ik_0 (\omega '_0 -x)} e^{i(k_0 x -\omega _0 t)}

where you see two terms cancel and the result is the given equation.
 
  • #33
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH. My mistake was that I though

f(x, 0) = g(x)e^{ik_0x} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ f(x-\omega_0't,0) = g(x-\omega_0't)e^{ik_0x}

I forgot to substitute the x for x-\omega_0't in the exponential!

thx willem.
 
  • #34
I heard that wave packets are important in QM. 2 questions:

1) How important? Do they arise very often?

2) Are the notion of group velocity and dispersion important for quantum mechanical wave packets? I would guess that 'no', since the waves are probabilistic and not physical, so they don't propagate in a medium that we could call "dispersive".
 
  • #35
The group velocity is very important in QM (in my opinion at least) since the group velocity of a wave packet allows us to recover the classical expression of a free particle's kinetic energy.

From the Schrodinger equation of a free particle (V=0 everywhere):

i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \Psi
You can see it admits a plane wave solution of the form:

\Psi(\vec r)=A\exp\left(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t\right)
if the dispersion relation is:
\omega = \frac{\hbar |\vec k|^2}{2m}

I'll use the Planck-Einstein relations: E=\hbar \omega and \vec p = \hbar \vec k.
Applying them above we immediately see that E=p^2/2m as it should classically.

Now (let's take it in 1D), the phase velocity is:
\frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{\hbar k}{2m}=\frac{p}{2m}
so it goes at half the speed the it is supposed to go classically. You need the GROUP velocity though:

\frac{d\omega}{dk}=\frac{\hbar k}{m}=\frac{p}{m}
which corresponds to the classical speed of the particle.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Where did you pull that dispersion relation from?

And what about the other dispersion relations? For exemple, how was it established that the dispersion relation for waves in deep water is what it is? was it experiemntally?
 
  • #37
That plane wave will only be a solution to the Schrodinger equation if that relation between w and k hold. So that's where it comes from. Just plug \Psi(\vec r)=A\exp\left(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t\right) into the Schrodinger equation and see for yourself.

I honestly don't know how the dispersion relation is derived for waves in water. I`m sure sSomeone else may be able to help you there.



 
  • #38
Galileo said:
The group velocity is very important in QM (in my opinion at least) since the group velocity of a wave packet allows us to recover the classical expression of a free particle's kinetic energy.

The relation between the group and phase speed of the de Broglie wave is
very different from that of classical waves, see my write-up here:

Relativistic kinematics of the wave packet:
http://www.chip-architect.com/physics/deBroglie.pdf

Section 1: The the broglie-wave is purely the result of the non-simultaneity of SR
Section 2: The wave packet at rest
Section 3: The moving wave packet
Section 4: The >c phase speed
Section 5: The group speed (recovering the correct time-dilation)
Section 6: The relativistic rotated wave front.

The last part shows that a significant part of both Special Relativity
and Quantum mechanics can be derived from the rule that the wave front
is always at 90 degrees angles with the (physical) group speed, for light
waves as matter waves.

Now illustrated with simulation images.



Regards, Hans
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K