Waves, dispersion, group speed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of wave packets, dispersion, phase velocity, and group velocity in the context of wave motion, particularly in water waves. Participants seek clarification on the definitions and implications of these concepts, as well as derivations related to group velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding wave packets and the relationship between phase and group velocity, asking for clarification on the implications of group velocity being faster than phase velocity.
  • Another participant requests a derivation of the group velocity formula, noting that existing sources do not provide a clear explanation.
  • A definition of phase velocity is provided, along with a description of how group velocity can be derived from the interference of two waves with nearly equal frequencies.
  • Some participants discuss the conditions under which the group velocity formula is valid, particularly in the context of two waves versus multiple waves.
  • One participant proposes a mathematical explanation involving the superposition of partial waves and derives the group velocity from this framework, though another participant questions the initial assumptions of this derivation.
  • Further contributions include a detailed explanation of wave packets and their mathematical representation, emphasizing the importance of a sharply peaked wavenumber distribution for meaningful group velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation of group velocity or the conditions under which it is applicable. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the concepts are presented, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight limitations in understanding due to the complexity of the mathematical derivations and the assumptions made regarding wave interactions. The dependence on the shape of the wavenumber distribution and the conditions for valid approximations are noted but remain unresolved.

  • #31
I should have added the first part of the "tutorial" too so you see what is g(x) and can actually do the calculations involving equ.2 and 4 to get to equ.12. here it is:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3928

Personally, I see no mistake up to equ. 12 where the exponential term just dispears. It can't have been "incorporated" in g(x), that'd make no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
quasar987 said:
I should have added the first part of the "tutorial" too so you see what is g(x) and can actually do the calculations involving equ.2 and 4 to get to equ.12. here it is:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3928

Aha...if that is the definition of g, it exactly accounts for eq 12.

Personally, I see no mistake up to equ. 12 where the exponential term just dispears. It can't have been "incorporated" in g(x), that'd make no sense.

It does, and it is...

g(x-\omega '_0 t) e^{i(k_0 x -\omega _0 t)} = f(x-\omega '_0 t,0) e^{ik_0 (\omega '_0 -x)} e^{i(k_0 x -\omega _0 t)}

where you see two terms cancel and the result is the given equation.
 
  • #33
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH. My mistake was that I though

f(x, 0) = g(x)e^{ik_0x} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ f(x-\omega_0't,0) = g(x-\omega_0't)e^{ik_0x}

I forgot to substitute the x for x-\omega_0't in the exponential!

thx willem.
 
  • #34
I heard that wave packets are important in QM. 2 questions:

1) How important? Do they arise very often?

2) Are the notion of group velocity and dispersion important for quantum mechanical wave packets? I would guess that 'no', since the waves are probabilistic and not physical, so they don't propagate in a medium that we could call "dispersive".
 
  • #35
The group velocity is very important in QM (in my opinion at least) since the group velocity of a wave packet allows us to recover the classical expression of a free particle's kinetic energy.

From the Schrödinger equation of a free particle (V=0 everywhere):

i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 \Psi
You can see it admits a plane wave solution of the form:

\Psi(\vec r)=A\exp\left(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t\right)
if the dispersion relation is:
\omega = \frac{\hbar |\vec k|^2}{2m}

I'll use the Planck-Einstein relations: E=\hbar \omega and \vec p = \hbar \vec k.
Applying them above we immediately see that E=p^2/2m as it should classically.

Now (let's take it in 1D), the phase velocity is:
\frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{\hbar k}{2m}=\frac{p}{2m}
so it goes at half the speed the it is supposed to go classically. You need the GROUP velocity though:

\frac{d\omega}{dk}=\frac{\hbar k}{m}=\frac{p}{m}
which corresponds to the classical speed of the particle.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Where did you pull that dispersion relation from?

And what about the other dispersion relations? For exemple, how was it established that the dispersion relation for waves in deep water is what it is? was it experiemntally?
 
  • #37
That plane wave will only be a solution to the Schrödinger equation if that relation between w and k hold. So that's where it comes from. Just plug \Psi(\vec r)=A\exp\left(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t\right) into the Schrödinger equation and see for yourself.

I honestly don't know how the dispersion relation is derived for waves in water. I`m sure sSomeone else may be able to help you there.



 
  • #38
Galileo said:
The group velocity is very important in QM (in my opinion at least) since the group velocity of a wave packet allows us to recover the classical expression of a free particle's kinetic energy.

The relation between the group and phase speed of the de Broglie wave is
very different from that of classical waves, see my write-up here:

Relativistic kinematics of the wave packet:
http://www.chip-architect.com/physics/deBroglie.pdf

Section 1: The the broglie-wave is purely the result of the non-simultaneity of SR
Section 2: The wave packet at rest
Section 3: The moving wave packet
Section 4: The >c phase speed
Section 5: The group speed (recovering the correct time-dilation)
Section 6: The relativistic rotated wave front.

The last part shows that a significant part of both Special Relativity
and Quantum mechanics can be derived from the rule that the wave front
is always at 90 degrees angles with the (physical) group speed, for light
waves as matter waves.

Now illustrated with simulation images.



Regards, Hans
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K