Wavespeed in a Vibrating String

  • Thread starter Thread starter k3vination
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Vibrating
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a vibrating string attached to a tuning fork with a frequency of 388Hz. Initially, the tension in the string is calculated to be 1800N with a mass of 1kg, leading to a wavespeed of 600m/s. After replacing the mass with 4kg, the tension increases to 7200N, resulting in a new wavespeed of 60m/s. The wavelength is calculated to be approximately 0.15m, but the poster's calculation of 13 wavelengths occupying the string is deemed incorrect. The poster seeks clarification on where the error may lie in their calculations.
k3vination
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tuning fork, frequency 388Hz, is mounted vertically on a ring stand. A string of length 2m is attached to the tuning fork, and a mass m is hung at the end of the string. The tuning fork is activated, and a wave passes through the string (wavespeed 600m/s.) Assume the tension does not affect the frequency.

If mass m is replaced with mass 4m, how many wavelengths, or fractions of a wavelength, occupy the string?

Homework Equations


wavelength= velocity/frequency
wavespeed= sqrt[tension/(mass/length)] in a vibrating string


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so I used the second equation to isolate T before more mass was added, assuming m=1kg. I found the tension, and it was 1800N. Then I found the wavespeed after the mass was added. Since the mass increased by a factor of 4, I used 7200N as the tension and 4kg as the mass. I found the velocity to be 60m/s. Then I used the first equation to find the wavelength, 0.15m approx. Then I divided 2 by that to find how many whole waves would occupy the string, which was 13, and apparently that is wrong.

I am not sure what I am doing wrong, thanks for helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hope I'm not breaking any forum rules by bumping...

bump.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top