I Ways to minimize scattering as T increases

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ZeroFunGame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
ZeroFunGame
Messages
93
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
as temperature rises in a MOSFET, are there tricks to prevent the Coulomb/phonon scattering? Or at least minimize it?
as temperature rises in a MOSFET, are there tricks to prevent the Coulomb/phonon scattering? Or at least minimize it?

This is in reference to Fig 4 here:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f8a0/b9b7030f7201ef17c6ff66ec660fd75c7aae.pdf

The more overarching question is related to ring oscillators and circuits in general, and whether there is a way to minimize frequency degradation as temperature is increased.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dip the circuit in liquid nitrogen.
 
Added the caveat that you cannot cool the device :)

I was thinking semiconductor material engineering, or circuit compensation, etc. Not sure if these actually exist as solutions
 
ZeroFunGame said:
Added the caveat that you cannot cool the device :)

I was thinking semiconductor material engineering, or circuit compensation, etc. Not sure if these actually exist as solutions

Improve surface state density via improved dielectrics, reduce phonon scattering via strain and isotropic doping, reduce surface scattering by reducing surface roughness. There's a few more, but I guess standard channel engineering tricks to boost mobility is the way to go
 
ZeroFunGame said:
Improve surface state density via improved dielectrics
Could you explain what you mean by this quote above?

What is isotropic doping?

Could you also talk about your limitations? For example, must you use silicon?
 
  • Like
Likes fluidistic
Dr_Nate said:
Could you explain what you mean by this quote above?

What is isotropic doping?

Could you also talk about your limitations? For example, must you use silicon?

My understanding is that you want to reduce interface states and charge traps, as this could lead to greater scattering at the dielectric semiconductor interface, thus reducing mobility (please correct me if I am mistaken)

Isotropic doping, I assume means uniform doping as a function of depth, but my understanding here could be mistaken.

Limitations? No, you don't have you use silicon. For example, why not use GaN since they have a wide bandgap. But then the limitations wouldn't be interface states or doping since it's a HEMT structure. Diamond or GaO or SiC could be another option. I'm not sure what you mean by limitations -- for Si, it's the dominance of intrinsic carriers as T increases
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top