Weak force holds neutrons together?

granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
I have been given the impression that the weak force is what holds the neutron together (preventing it from decaying to an electron and proton)
and that the neutron eventually decayed, despite this weak force, by 'tunneling out'

Is that right or am I way off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not right.
 
The weak force is responsible for the decay. This decay is not suppressed - free neutrons _do_ decay.

The binding of quarks in the neutron is due to the strong force. The residual strong force which holds protons and neutrons together in nuclei _does_ suppress the decay of the neutron
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top