Weak Induction implies Strong Induction

In summary, weak induction and strong induction are two different forms of mathematical induction that can be used to prove statements about natural numbers, with strong induction being the more powerful of the two. Thank you for your attention.
  • #1
Terrell
317
26

Homework Statement


[/B]
Weak Induction:
If (i) ##S(1)## holds, and (ii) for every ##k \geq 1(S(k) \Rightarrow S(k+1)##. Then ##\forall n \geq 1##, ##S(n)## holds.

Strong Induction:
If (i) ##S(k)## is true and (ii) ##\forall m\geq k [S(k) \land \cdots \land S(m)]\Rightarrow S(m+1)##. Then for every ##n \geq k##, the statement ##S(n)## is true.

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


Base case: k = 1; If ##S(1)## is true and ##[S(1)\land\cdots \land S(m)]\Rightarrow S(m+1)##, then observe that this is the exact assertion of weak induction. So the base case holds.

Inductive case: Let ##N:=\{z \in \Bbb{N} \vert \text{z satisfying (i) and (ii) of strong induction}\Rightarrow \forall n \geq z(S(n) \text{is true.})\}##. Suppose ##k \in N##, ##S(k+1)## is true, and ##\forall m' \geq k+1[S(k+1)\land \cdots \land S(m')]\Rightarrow S(m'+1)##. Since ##k \in N \Rightarrow \forall n\geq k(S(n)\text{ is true})## and ##k+1 \gt k##, then ##\forall j\geq k+1 \gt k[S(j) \text{ is true.}]##. Therefore, ##k+1 \in N## and by weak induction, strong induction is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for your post on the topic of weak and strong induction. I wanted to provide some additional insights and clarifications on the topic.

Firstly, I want to clarify that weak and strong induction are two different proof techniques that are used to prove statements about natural numbers. They are both based on the principle of mathematical induction, which states that if a statement is true for the first natural number (base case) and if it can be shown that the truth of the statement for any natural number implies the truth of the statement for the next natural number (inductive case), then the statement is true for all natural numbers.

Now, let's take a closer look at the two types of induction. Weak induction is also known as the principle of mathematical induction and it is the most commonly used form of induction. It follows the basic principle mentioned above, i.e., if the statement is true for the first natural number and if the truth of the statement for any natural number implies the truth of the statement for the next natural number, then the statement is true for all natural numbers.

On the other hand, strong induction is a more powerful form of induction. It follows the same basic principle, but the inductive case is slightly different. In strong induction, we assume that the statement is true not just for the next natural number, but for all natural numbers up to and including the next natural number. This allows us to prove statements that cannot be proved using weak induction alone.

In your attempt at a solution, you have correctly identified the base case and the inductive case for strong induction. However, I would like to point out that the definition of the set N that you have used is not entirely accurate. N should contain all natural numbers k for which the statement is true, not just those that satisfy (i) and (ii) of strong induction.

Additionally, I would like to mention that strong induction can be used to prove statements about any set of numbers, not just natural numbers. This is because the inductive case is based on the assumption that the statement is true for all numbers up to and including the next number, rather than just the next number itself.

In conclusion, both weak and strong induction are valuable proof techniques that can be used to prove statements about natural numbers. While weak induction is the more commonly used form, strong induction can be used to prove statements that cannot be proved using weak induction alone.

I hope this helps to clarify
 

1. What is the principle of "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction"?

The principle of "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" states that if a statement is true for a base case and if it can be shown that assuming the statement is true for any arbitrary case implies that it is also true for the next case, then the statement is true for all cases.

2. How is "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" different from regular mathematical induction?

Regular mathematical induction requires proving the statement for the base case and then proving that if it is true for any arbitrary case, it is also true for the next case. "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" only requires proving the statement for the base case and showing that assuming it is true for any arbitrary case implies that it is also true for the next case.

3. What are the advantages of using "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" in proofs?

Using "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" can often make proofs simpler and more concise, as it eliminates the need for proving the statement for any arbitrary case. It also allows for a more intuitive understanding of the proof, as it relies on the assumption that the statement is true for all cases.

4. Can "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" be used for all mathematical statements?

No, "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" can only be used for statements that follow a specific pattern, where assuming the statement is true for any arbitrary case implies that it is also true for the next case. It cannot be used for statements that do not follow this pattern.

5. Are there any limitations to using "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" in proofs?

One limitation of using "Weak Induction implies Strong Induction" is that it can only be used for proofs that follow a specific pattern. It may not be applicable for more complex or non-linear proofs. Additionally, it may not always be the most efficient method for proving a statement, as it may require more steps than other proof techniques.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
271
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
505
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
947
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
577
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
521
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
515
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
550
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
Back
Top