I Weak interaction between electrons

Philipsmett
Messages
78
Reaction score
4
The two electrons will be repelled by electrostatic force, but they interact with weak force, means that in addition to the electrostatic force between the electrons there will be weak force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philipsmett said:
The two electrons will be repelled by electrostatic force, but they interact with weak force, means that in addition to the electrostatic force between the electrons there will be weak force?

Yes. In fact, due to the nature of the electroweak interaction, every electromagnetic interaction necessarily comes with a corresponding weak interaction, since every particle which interacts with a photon must also interact with the weak Z0 boson.
 
  • Like
Likes Philipsmett
king vitamin said:
due to the nature of the electroweak interaction, every electromagnetic interaction necessarily comes with a corresponding weak interaction, since every particle which interacts with a photon must also interact with the weak Z0 boson.

This is true in principle, but leaves out a key point. At temperatures much below the Z0 boson mass (which is temperatures everywhere except inside high-energy experiments like the LHC, or possibly deep inside the cores of very hot stars), the amplitude for weak interaction is negligible compared to the amplitude for electromagnetic interaction. So, for example, if you are talking about the energy levels of electrons in atoms, weak interactions have no measurable impact (and "measurable" here means to eleven or twelve decimal places, accurate enough to see fairly high order QED effects). Similar remarks apply to any electromagnetic phenomenon encountered in daily life.
 
  • Like
Likes Philipsmett and dextercioby
PeterDonis said:
This is true in principle, but leaves out a key point. At temperatures much below the Z0 boson mass (which is temperatures everywhere except inside high-energy experiments like the LHC, or possibly deep inside the cores of very hot stars), the amplitude for weak interaction is negligible compared to the amplitude for electromagnetic interaction. So, for example, if you are talking about the energy levels of electrons in atoms, weak interactions have no measurable impact (and "measurable" here means to eleven or twelve decimal places, accurate enough to see fairly high order QED effects). Similar remarks apply to any electromagnetic phenomenon encountered in daily life.
electrons exchange only Z0 bosons or also WE +/- bosons?
 
Philipsmett said:
electrons exchange only Z0 bosons or also WE +/- bosons?

If you're talking about contributions to the electrostatic force between charged particles, there will be a Z0 boson exchange Feynman diagram possible (but, as I noted, it will be way too small to make any measurable contribution to the observed force), but no W+ or W- boson exchange diagrams, since that would obviously violate charge conservation. However, there are more complicated Feynman diagrams possible that could involve W+ or W- bosons as intermediates (but the contributions from those would be much smaller even than the Z0 boson exchange contribution).
 
  • Like
Likes Philipsmett
W bosons produce So called flavour changing currents, so no, electrons cannot directly emit or absorb W bosons.
Philipsmett said:
electrons exchange only Z0 bosons or also WE +/- bosons?

That being said, they can be created at weak vertices so a Z boson can decay to a pair of W’s Though because of the propagator it diminishes the amplitude of that interaction significantly.

PeterDonis said:
If you're talking about contributions to the electrostatic force between charged particles, there will be a Z0 boson exchange Feynman diagram possible (but, as I noted, it will be way too small to make any measurable contribution to the observed force), but no W+ or W- boson exchange diagrams, since that would obviously violate charge conservation. However, there are more complicated Feynman diagrams possible that could involve W+ or W- bosons as intermediates (but the contributions from those would be much smaller even than the Z0 boson exchange contribution).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
827
Replies
1
Views
998
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top