Weak interaction - half-lifetime of a decay

Soff
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I need help with an exercise about the weak interaction:

How do the mass, the q-value and the vertices depend on the half-lifetime of a decay?

The myon decay has a half-lifetime of 0.0000015 seconds, the neutron decay has a half-lifetime of 607 seconds.

Why is there such a big difference between this two times? Is this because the q-value of a myon is 105MeV while the q-value of a neutron is 0.782MeV? Or has it maybe to do with the involved mas?

Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soff said:
Hello!
I need help with an exercise about the weak interaction:

How do the mass, the q-value and the vertices depend on the half-lifetime of a decay?

The myon decay has a half-lifetime of 0.0000015 seconds, the neutron decay has a half-lifetime of 607 seconds.

Why is there such a big difference between this two times? Is this because the q-value of a myon is 105MeV while the q-value of a neutron is 0.782MeV? Or has it maybe to do with the involved mas?

Please help me!

Really good exersice. Muon decay is covered in most textbooks, and all the other weak decays except the neutron scale with the quintic power of the mass, in a first approximation. For the neutron, which has a rare decay between two quarks of similar masses in the presence of another one of the same order, the calculation is troublesome and I only know of a textbook covering it, probably Griffith's.

You can argue that the q-value is not the whole history if you consider the decay of the charged pion to muon.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top