Weakly nonlinear theories in electrohydrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a derived equation for electrified fluid flow in a channel, resembling a Benjamin-Ono equation, with a numerical solution that aligns with expected results. However, when the nonlinear term is set to zero in the numerical code, the results do not match the analytical solution, showing a significant discrepancy. The author seeks insights into potential errors in the numerical implementation or the analytical approach. Suggestions and experiences related to similar issues in numerical and analytical comparisons are requested. The inquiry highlights challenges in reconciling numerical simulations with theoretical predictions in electrohydrodynamics.
hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
33
I have been working on the problem of electrified fluid flow down a channel with a moving pressure distribution. I have derived an equation which describes the free surface of said fluid flow which is a Benjamin-Ono like equation. I have a numerical solution for this equation and it gives the sort of pictures that I expect.

I can ignore the nonlinear part of the equation and I can an equation which I can solve analytically via Fourier transforms. Here is what is winding me up: When I set the nonlinear term to zero in my numerical code and compare it to my analytical solution, they should match but they don't, it's almost a factor of 10 out.

Has anyone come across this sort of thing happening before? Is it something I've done wrong?

Any suggestions are always welcome.

Mat
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
163
Views
26K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top