How Do SI and Imperial Units Relate in Weight, Density, and Gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between SI units and Imperial units concerning weight, density, and gravity, using water as a primary example. Participants explore the conversion between these systems and the implications of different unit definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to equate the weight of water in SI units with that in Imperial units, referencing the formula F = m g.
  • Another participant points out that pounds are units of force while kilograms are units of mass, suggesting a need for clarity in conversions.
  • A participant attempts to derive the weight of water in both systems, noting the difference between pounds of force and pounds of mass, leading to uncertainty about the equivalence of values derived from different unit systems.
  • One reply critiques the initial reasoning, emphasizing that weight depends on the amount of water and that density is mass per unit volume, not just mass.
  • A participant expresses frustration with the complexity of the topic and the perceived lack of straightforward answers, seeking clarity on the values of force, mass, and gravity for water in both unit systems.
  • Another participant suggests using the slug as the proper unit of mass in the Imperial system, providing a conversion for density and weight of water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the definitions and conversions between SI and Imperial units, as well as the interpretation of weight and mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the distinctions between mass, weight, and density, leading to confusion in their calculations and interpretations. There are unresolved assumptions about the definitions and applications of units in different contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals transitioning between SI and Imperial units, particularly those seeking to understand the implications of unit conversions in physics and engineering contexts.

kaboo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm struggling to understand the relationship between SI units and Imperial units when it comes to weight, density and gravity. Using water as an example:

I know that F = m g

I also know that gravity is g = 9.81 m/s^2 or 32.174 ft/s^2 and that
density of water is Pw = 1,000Kg/m^3 and that
the weight of water is 62.43 pounds per cubic foot, or 62.43 lbf/ft^3.

So with this knowledge what is the formula to get
Weight of water (in SI units) == weight of water (in Imperial units)

When starting form F = m g?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pounds is a unit of force
Kilogram is a unit of mass

Try this hyperlink:

http://www.engineering.ucsb.edu/~me15web/top_menu/tables/table_4_unit_conversion.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does water = water?

Ok, that's what I thought! So you would think that the SI water (water density * gravity) should equal the Imperial water (water weight * a conversion factor), right?
Well, let's see...

First, the Imperial side of the equation:
If [tex]1 m = 3.2808 ft[/tex] then [tex]1m^3 = 35.31 ft^3[/tex] and if the weight of water is [tex]\frac{62.43 lb_{f}} {ft^3}}[/tex] then [tex]\frac{62.43 lb_{f}} {ft^3} \times \frac{35.31 ft^3} {m^3} = \frac{2,204.6 lb_{f}} {m^3}[/tex], right?

Now for the SI side:
If density of water is [tex]\frac{1,000Kg} {m^3}[/tex] and if density is another way of saying fluid mass, then the mass of water is also [tex]\frac{1,000Kg} {m^3}[/tex], right?

And if [tex]1Kg = 2.2046 lb_{m}[/tex] then [tex]\frac{1,000Kg} {m^3}\times \frac{2.2046 lb_{m}}{1Kg} = \frac{2,204.6lb_{m}}{m^3}[/tex].

Wow, water = water, Right? Wrong!
Even though (the Imperial water) [tex]\frac{2,204.6 lb_{f}} {m^3} = \frac{2,204.6lb_{m}}{m^3}[/tex] (the SI water) looks the same, they're not, look again!

[tex]lb_{f} \neq lb_{m}[/tex], [tex]lb_{f}[/tex] is "pounds of force" whereas, [tex]lb_{m}[/tex] is "pounds of mass".

We know that [tex]f=m \times g[/tex], thus, [tex]lb_{f} = lb_{m} \times g[/tex]!

Conclusion
As I see it, there are at lest three possible outcomes:
  1. The Imperial weight of water is truly the mass of water, or
  2. The SI mass of water is really the weight of water, or (my personal favorite)
  3. I messed up some where!

So, can someone help me out? What did I do wrong?

Yes, I can...
In writing this response, as carefully as I knew how, I discovered (just a moment ago) that I was wrong! Here's what I discovered...

In (some) physics books, applications and web based conversion utilities they state that...

[tex]1Kg = 2.2046 lb[/tex]

However, it isn't clear that they are converting 1 unit of mass to 1 unit of weight. Therefore I think it should read:

[tex]1Kg = 2.2046 lb\ (of\ weight)[/tex] or
[tex]1Kg = 2.2046 lb_{f}[/tex] or better yet
[tex]1Kg = 0.0685 lb\ (of\ mass)[/tex]

I've spent some serious time and energy trying to figure out why it appeared that water did not equal water. I hope that sharing my frustrations and findings will help you as much as writing this has helped me. Thanks for reading.

One final thought, explaining your problem (in writing or verbally) to someone will normally show you where you went wrong.

-kaboo
 
Much of this makes no sense whatsoever:

kaboo said:
Ok, that's what I thought! So you would think that the SI water (water density * gravity) should equal the Imperial water (water weight * a conversion factor), right?
Well, let's see...

Well, water density*gravitational field strength will give you weight per unit volume. As for "water weight"...that depends on how much water you have! I don't see how you can assign to it a single value. And "the SI water should equal the Imperial water" sounds like nonsense to me. Water does not have units! Measurable physical quanitities such as mass, volume, density, weight, etc...these have units

First, the Imperial side of the equation:
If [tex]1 m = 3.2808 ft[/tex] then [tex]1m^3 = 35.31 ft^3[/tex] and if the weight of water is [tex]\frac{62.43 lb_{f}} {ft^3}}[/tex] then [tex]\frac{62.43 lb_{f}} {ft^3} \times \frac{35.31 ft^3} {m^3} = \frac{2,204.6 lb_{f}} {m^3}[/tex], right?

What do you mean by the "weight of water?" Where did you get this number from? Does it not depend on how much water you have? Besides, this number is in units of weight per unit volume. Wheter it is accurate, I have no idea.

Now for the SI side:
If density of water is [tex]\frac{1,000Kg} {m^3}[/tex] and if density is another way of saying fluid mass, then the mass of water is also [tex]\frac{1,000Kg} {m^3}[/tex], right?

Density is another way of saying mass per unit volume, not just mass! To simply state...the mass of water is 'x' is meaningless. We can only measure the mass of a certain amount of water, not just water in general, whatever the hell that means. To state, the density of water is 'x' is fine, and that is what you have done here.

Wow, water = water, Right? Wrong!

Again, this is totally meaningless! You persist in speaking as though water is a measure of something! It is not! In fact, it is a compound! Water is the something we are measuring.

So, can someone help me out? What did I do wrong?
-kaboo

Knowing the distinction between mass and weight, and between mass and density would be helpful. Maybe you do, but your discussion indicated that you did not. Also learn to distinguish between quantities that indicate properties of a substance independent of amount (e.g. density) and quantities that indicate the amount of a substance (mass, or volume).
 
Frustrated and angry!

I came to the physics forums to ask, what I thought, was a very straight forward question - obviously it wasn't.

Like most people, I've been raised to think in Imperial (British) system, namely feet, pounds and seconds (where a pound is a measurement of weight). I am trying to 'think' in SI. However, I can't tell if my answer makes sense because meters and grams don’t have any 'real-world' meaning to me yet. Therefore, I'm trying to figure out how to convert between SI and the old IM way of doing thing so I can see if my numbers and formulas 'looks' right.

Also, I thought that the physics forums was to be a “safe” place to learn and to ask questions regarding physics, regardless if you are an expert on the subject or not.

So, Cepheid, instead of “griping” about “how” I didn't setup the problem correctly or that I used thing incorrectly. Why don’t you first try answering the original question or seeking to understand what it is that I am trying to ask, and I am sorry if I didn't express things correctly.

Let’s try this again. All I want to know is the force, mass and gravity (of water) in both SI and IM units, where the two sides of the equations are equal. Six values along with their proper units, that's all. If you want to show the formula on how they relate that would be a nice bonus.
 
To compare apples to apples, use the imperial unit for mass, the slug. 1 kg = 0.06852 slugs (approx). The weight of one slug can be found by w = mg --> (1 slug) (32.174 ft/s^2) = 32.174 pounds.

In the imperial system, mass is properly measured in slugs. Sure, in common usage, it is also measured in pounds. To convert, use w = mg.

The density of water (mass/volume) is 1000 kg/m^3. Let's convert:
[tex]1000 {kg}/m^3 (\frac{0.0685 {slug}}{1 {kg}}) (\frac{1 m^3}{35.315 {ft}^3}) = 1.940{slugs}/{ft}^3[/tex].
If you want to get pounds per cubic foot, use w = mg to convert from slugs to pounds; you'll get 62.4 lbs/ft^3.

Does this help?
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
59
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
33K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K