Weight of a block in equilibrium in a system.

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about calculating the mass of block A in a mobile system in equilibrium, participants emphasized the importance of correctly determining the torque and the center of mass of the rods. The initial attempts to calculate the mass of block A were flawed due to incorrect assumptions about where the rod's weight acts. It was clarified that the resultant mass of the rod acts at its center of mass, not at the attachment points of the blocks. The correct approach involves summing torques around specific points to account for all forces acting on the lower rod, including the weights of the blocks and the rod itself. Properly applying these principles should lead to the accurate calculation of block A's mass.
IAmPat
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The picture below shows a mobile
in equilibrium. Each of the rods is 0.16m long and each hangs from a supporting string that is attached one fourth of the way across it. The mass of each rod is 0.10kg. The mass of the strings connecting the blocks to the rods is negligible. What is the mass of block A.


HD87s.png


Homework Equations



Net Torque = 0
Rod length (left side) = 0.12m
Rod length (right side) = 0.04m

Weight of Rod (left side) = 0.075kg
Weight of Rod (right side) = 0.025kg

Weight of block A = 9.8A

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried two methods, neither worked. I don't know how to get the torque of the rod itself.

(0.30 + 0.075) * 9.8 = 3.675N
3.675 * 0.12 = 0.441 >> Torque of left side

.441 = [[A + 0.025] * 9.8] * 0.04
11.025 = [A + 0.025] * 9.8
1.125 = A + 0.025
1.1 = A >> Mass of A

But this was wrong. I also tried to do the problem by ignoring the mass of the rod, but that was also wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have incorrectly assumed that the mass of each part of the lower rod acts at the point where the block masses are attached. The resultant mass of the rod acts at its center of mass.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You have incorrectly assumed that the mass of each part of the lower rod acts at the point where the block masses are attached. The resultant mass of the rod acts at its center of mass.

It should work out correctly using tension forces on the rod at the points where the block masses are attached. Certainly you would have to agree that this is where the forces are actually exerted.. It is not incorrect to handle the problem this way.

What I would try is to choose two points, call them O and P. Say P is on the lower rod at the point where mass A is hanging from the lower rod. The sum of all torques on the rod calculated with P as the origin must be zero. So this equation allows you to find the tension in the string that the lower rod is hanging from. Now say point O is on the lower rod at the point where the known mass hangs from. Calculated the Sum of all the torques about this point and it must also be equal to zero. You know all of the distances and you know the tension in the string. This should lead you to the correct answer.
 
AlexChandler said:
It should work out correctly using tension forces on the rod at the points where the block masses are attached. Certainly you would have to agree that this is where the forces are actually exerted.. It is not incorrect to handle the problem this way.
There are forces acting on the lower rod from from three masses, the 0.30 kg mass of the left block, the unknown mass of block A, and the 0.1 kg mass of the rod itself. The weight force of the hanging masses act on the lower rod at the points where their respective masses are attached. The weight of the rod itself does not act at those points. It is simplest to find out where the resultant weight of the rod acts, apply that force at that point, and them sum torques = 0 about the point where the string supporting the lower rod is attached to it. This is what the OP was attempting to do, but incorrectly determined the moment arm of the rod's weight.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top