Weight required to hang straight down with known torque

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MoMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around determining the weight required to keep a weight hanging straight down on a rotating shaft, given a known torque. It explores theoretical implications and calculations related to torque and weight, while considering various assumptions and conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how much weight is needed to maintain a vertical position for a weight on a rotating shaft, assuming zero lever weight.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that an infinite weight would be required to achieve this condition.
  • A participant proposes a scenario where the shaft is deflected and questions how to calculate the restoring torque from gravity acting on the deflected weight.
  • Concerns are raised about the application of the problem, with some participants questioning its validity or purpose.
  • A participant discusses the implications of torque calculations, suggesting that for any finite weight, the torque would be zero, leading to potential rotation of the weight unless the weight is infinite.
  • Two participants raise questions about the perceptibility of macro scale accelerations and their implications for modeling over long periods.
  • A mathematical expression is provided, relating mass, torque, static friction, radius, and gravitational acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the problem, with some questioning its application and others engaging with the theoretical aspects. There is no consensus on the validity or the implications of the proposed scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the weight of the shaft and the nature of deflection are not fully defined, and the discussion includes speculative elements regarding infinite weight and torque calculations.

MoMan
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
How much Weight (W) is required to keep a weight hanging straight down when the torque is known on a rotating shaft? Please see attached image. Assume a lever weight of zero to keep it simple.
Weight calculator.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
MoMan said:
it simple

Yeah, ##\infty##
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, nasu, Lnewqban and 2 others
MoMan said:
How much Weight (W) is required to keep a weight hanging straight down when the torque is known on a rotating shaft? Please see attached image. Assume a shaft weight of zero to keep it simple.View attachment 303451
Suppose that the shaft is deflected so that it does not hang straight down. Suppose that it is deflected by ##x## meters rightward, for instance. Do you know how to calculate how much restoring torque results from gravity pulling on the deflected weight?

There is a simple answer to the question you ask. But the Physics Forums way is to guide you into discovering that answer for yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
What's the application ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
The way to answer this question with infinities: The torque of weight around the central point of the shaft is ##T_W=W\cdot 1m\cdot \sin 0##. For any finite W this equals to zero and hence the total torque will be equal to the torque from shaft and it will rotate the weight.
However if ##W=\infty## then $$T_W=\infty\cdot 0=\text {maybe something finite and equal to -}T_{shaft}$$ and hence for infinite weight the system might not rotate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
hmmm27 said:
What's the application ?
It's either a puzzle (and not a very good one, IMO), or he's just trolling.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and jbriggs444
At what point do macro scale accelerations become imperceptible? Can we not effectively consider the rotation of ##0.1 ^{\circ}## over 10 years as effectively no acceleration. We do this kind of thing all the time in our modeling.
 
erobz said:
At what point do macro scale accelerations become imperceptible? Can we not effectively consider the rotation of ##0.1 ^{\circ}## over 10 years as effectively no acceleration. We do this kind of thing all the time in our modeling.
Well after the point at which suspended weights break the mechanism.
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and erobz
$$m=\frac\tau{\mu_s{rg}}$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K