Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass

Heffernana
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In Weinberg QFT vol 1, page 69, when deriving the little group structure for the case of zero mass can anyone explain the following:

The transformation W by definition leaves k^{\mu}=(0,0,1,1) invariant, i.e. W^{\mu}_{\nu}k^{\nu} = k^{\mu}. Why can you immediately deduce from this that for a time-like vector t^{\mu}=(0,0,0,1) whose length (noting Weinberg's bizarre placing of the time component at the end of the 4-vector) is t^2=-1 is invariant under the previous W transformation, i.e. that:

(Wt)^{\mu}(Wt)_{\mu}=t^{\mu}t_{\mu}=-1

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W is defined to be a member of a certain subgroup of the Lorentz group, so it's a Lorentz transformation. By definition, a Lorentz transformation W satisfies W^T\eta W=\eta, and this implies (Wt)^2=(Wt)^T\eta(Wt) =t^TW^T\eta Wt=t^T\eta t=t^2=-1. You don't have to use the assumption about the components of t for anything other than the final "=-1".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top